In Search of “Good Russians”: Ukrainian-Russian Encounters in the United States During the First Cold War

Author:

Kravchenko VolodymyrORCID

Abstract

 The article is devoted to the topic of Ukrainian-Russian intellectual encounters in exile during the Cold War. The author focuses on Ukraine’s and Russia’s mutual representations in historical narratives in connection with their respective discourses of national identity. The article also describes sporadic attempts at establishing Ukrainian-Russian public dialogue in exile starting in the early 1960s. All of them were initiated and conducted by Ukrainian public activists and intellectuals. The author concludes that participants on both sides ascribed opposing meanings to historical terms. Russian authors, on the one hand, consistently used the modern designation “Ukrainian” as a synonym for “Little Russian,” which automatically situated Ukraine within the “pan-Russian” historical framework. Ukrainian historians, on the other hand, tried to reinterpret “Russian” as a modern national designation rather than an imperial one. Hence the Ukrainian-Russian dialogue had no chance of succeeding unless Russian participants agreed to rethink their discourse of national identity. It is no wonder that many American observers remained confused about the nature of Ukrainian-Russian debates: to them, they looked like a dead-end situation. Thus, rather than trying to find alternative interpretations of Ukrainian and Russian history, most Western specialists followed either one or the other respective national narrative. 

Publisher

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II

Reference79 articles.

1. [Anonymous]. “Faith in ‘Eternal Russia.’” The Ukrainian Quarterly 7, no. 3: 197–202.

2. Bassin, Mark et al., eds. Between Europe and Asia: The Origins, Theories, and Legacies of Russian Eurasianism. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.

3. Bazanov, Petr. “Professor N.E. Andreev i ego vklad v izuchenie russkoi istorii i kul’tury” [“Professor N.E. Andreev and His Contribution to the Study of Russian History and Culture”]. Dialog so vremenem, no. 68 (2019): 215–23.

4. Bazanov, Petr. “Russkii myslitel’ Nikolai Ivanovich Ul’ianov o fenomene Ukrainskogo separatisma” [“The Russian Philosopher Nikolai Ivanovich Oulianoff on the Phenomenon of Ukrainian Separatism”]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii 16, no. 1 (2015): 157–68.

5. Bellezza, Simone Attilio. “Making Soviet Ukraine Ukrainian: The Debate on Ukrainian Statehood in the Journal Suchasnist’ (1961–1971).” Nationalities Papers 47, no. 3 (2019): 379–93.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3