Abstract
This article posits that clinical sociologists have ideal expertise to serve courts as a Guardian ad Litem. It explains what these court appointed representatives provide the court, their qualifications, and how they can advocate for the best interests of children in divorce, custody, shared-time, and other caregiving situations. Often decisions are made by judges with a adult-focused legal lens. Clinical sociologists have a background in both macro and micro issues that impact the wellbeing of children. They are able to contribute and integrate their scholarly and practical knowledge to make better informed decisions that the court can use. Common challenges that Guardian ad Litem face are identified, with insights on how clinical sociological expertise can overcome them.
Publisher
University of Johannesburg
Reference39 articles.
1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect and Committee on Bioethics. (2000). Forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment in abused children. Pediatrics, 106(5), 1151-1153. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.5.1151
2. American Bar Association. (1998). Court allows suit against guardian. ABA Journal, 41.
3. Aneiros, A.N., & Prenkert, J.D. (2022). In the best interest of children: A proposal for corporate guardian ad litems. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 26(2), 1-48.
4. Becker, Howard. (1967). Whose side are we on?. Social Problems, Volume 14, Issue 3, Winter 1967: 239–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/799147
5. Bilson, A., & White, S. (2005). Representing children’s views and best interests in court: An international comparison. Child Abuse Review, 14, 220-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.902