Abstract
Cartography played a crucial role during the partitioning of Africa. Territorial boundaries were marked on maps by the colonial powers. However, in some cases, maps were not precise regarding the sites they referred to. Some colonial powers changed original maps by shifting their territorial limits, thus staking a claim to other powers’ territories. In areas where territorial questions from maps had not been sufficiently addressed during the colonial period, the distorted maps became a primary source of border disputes in the post-colonial period. The paper is built on the premise that the cartographic foundation of the Malawi-Tanzania border is knotty. Consequently, Malawi and Tanzania inherited contradictory cartography, each state selecting maps that suits her interests to defend her sovereign limits. Indeed, this has stoked the dispute that has dawdled for decades since independence.
Publisher
University of Johannesburg
Reference20 articles.
1. Basset, T. J. (1994). Cartography and Empire Building in Nineteenth-Century West Africa. Geographical Review, 84(3), 316-355 https://doi.org/10.2307/215456
2. Donaldson, J. W. (2011). Perceptions of Legal and Geographical Clarity: Defining International Land Boundaries in Africa. In R. Home (Ed). Essays in African Land Law (pp 1-35).Pretoria University Law Press. https://bit.ly/3Z9cPv9
3. Ewusi, S.K., & Butera, J.B. (Eds.). Governance and Security Policy in Africa, Addis Ababa: UPEACE. http://hdl.handle.net/10625/53301.
4. Ian, B. (1979). African Boundaries: A Legal and Diplomatic Encyclopaedia University of California Press.
5. Iliffe, J. (1979). A Modern History of Tanganyika. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584114