Endoscopic Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer according to Type 2 Diabetes Status

Author:

Wang Kai1ORCID,Ma Wenjie23ORCID,Hu Yang4ORCID,Knudsen Markus Dines.156ORCID,Nguyen Long H.237ORCID,Wu Kana148ORCID,Ng Kimmie9ORCID,Wang Molin178ORCID,Ogino Shuji1101112ORCID,Sun Qi14813ORCID,Giovannucci Edward L.148ORCID,Chan Andrew T.2381214ORCID,Song Mingyang1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

2. 2Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

3. 3Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

4. 4Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

5. 5Section of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

6. 6Norwegian PSC Research Center, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Division of Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

7. 7Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

8. 8Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

9. 9Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

10. 10Cancer Immunology Program, Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

11. 11Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

12. 12Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

13. 13Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

14. 14Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

Abstract Current recommendations for colorectal cancer screening have not accounted for type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. It remains unknown whether the colorectal cancer–preventive benefit of endoscopic screening and the recommended age for screening initiation differ by T2D. Among 166,307 women (Nurses’ Health Study I and II, 1988–2017) and 42,875 men (Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 1988–2016), endoscopic screening and T2D diagnosis were biennially updated. We calculated endoscopic screening-associated hazard ratios (HR) and absolute risk reductions (ARR) for colorectal cancer incidence and mortality according to T2D, and age-specific colorectal cancer incidence according to T2D. During a median of 26 years of follow-up, we documented 3,457 colorectal cancer cases and 1,129 colorectal cancer deaths. Endoscopic screening was associated with a similar HR of colorectal cancer incidence in the T2D and non-T2D groups (P-multiplicative interaction = 0.57). In contrast, the endoscopic screening-associated ARR for colorectal cancer incidence was higher in the T2D group (2.36%; 95% CI, 1.55%–3.13%) than in the non-T2D group (1.73%; 95% CI, 1.29%–2.16%; P-additive interaction = 0.01). Individuals without T2D attained a 10-year cumulative risk of 0.35% at the benchmark age of 45 years, whereas those with T2D reached this threshold risk level at the age of 36 years. Similar results were observed for colorectal cancer mortality. In conclusion, the absolute benefit of endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer prevention may be substantially higher for individuals with T2D compared with those without T2D. Although T2D is comparatively rare prior to the fifth decade of life, the rising incidence of young-onset T2D and heightened colorectal cancer risk associated with T2D support the consideration of earlier endoscopic screening in individuals with T2D. Prevention Relevance: The endoscopic screening-associated ARRs for colorectal cancer incidence and mortality were higher for individuals with T2D than those without T2D. Endoscopic screening confers a greater benefit for colorectal cancer prevention among T2D individuals, who may also benefit from an earlier screening than the current recommendation.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

American Cancer Society

Massachusetts General Hospital

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3