Abstract GS2-06: Taxane with anthracycline versus taxane without anthracycline: An individual patient-level meta-analysis of 16,500 women with early-stage breast cancer in 13 randomised trials

Author:

Braybrooke Jeremy1,Bradley Rosie1,Gray Richard1,Hills Robert1,Liu Zulian1,Pan Hongchao1,Peto Richard1,Blum Joanne2,Chen Xiaosong3,Ejlertsen Bent4,Janni Wolfgang5,Nitz Ulrike6,Slamon Dennis7,Toi Masakazu8,Watanabe Toru9,Swain Sandra10,Bergh Jonas11,

Affiliation:

1. University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

2. Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology Network, Dallas, TX;

3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

4. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

5. University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

6. West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany

7. University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA;

8. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

9. Hamamatsu Oncology Centre, Hamamatsu, Japan

10. Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC;

11. Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background: Anthracycline and taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens reduce the rate of breast cancer recurrence by about one third compared to no chemotherapy. However, concerns about the increased risks of cardiac toxicity and leukaemia with anthracyclines have resulted in wider use of taxane chemotherapy schedules without anthracycline, in particular docetaxel-cyclophosphamide (DC). The benefits and risks of this approach have been assessed in several randomised trials but with conflicting results. Methods: We did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of data on 16,500 participants from 13 randomised controlled trials starting before 2010. Four compared 6 courses of DC with and without concurrent anthracycline (Anth), six compared sequential Anth then taxane (3 or 4 courses of Anth then 3 or 4 D, or vice versa) versus 6 courses of DC (resulting in a higher cumulative dose of taxane in the DC group), and 3 compared sequential Anth + D versus other taxane schedules. Primary outcomes were time to invasive breast cancer recurrence (distant, loco-regional, or new contralateral breast primary) and breast cancer mortality (by log-rank subtraction). Log-rank analyses were used to assess the first-event-rate ratio (RR) and confidence intervals. Pre-specified subgroup investigations included site of recurrence, age, ER/PR status, nodal status, tumor diameter, grade and HER2 status. Results: Overall, patients treated with an anthracycline and taxane combination averaged 18% lower rates of breast cancer recurrence (RR 0.82, 95%CI 0.75-0.90; p<0.0001) than those receiving a taxane schedule without anthracycline, equating to an absolute reduction of 3.1% (95%CI 1.4-4.8) in 10-year recurrence. The 10-year risk of death from breast cancer was reduced by 1.8% (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.75-0.95; p=0.006) with no increase in deaths without recurrence. The proportional reduction in recurrence was greatest in trials of concurrent Anth + DC versus DC (RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.55-0.79; p<0.0001), where the only difference between arms was the addition of anthracycline (cumulative dose of doxorubicin≈300mg/m2). By contrast, in trials of sequential Anth + D versus the higher cumulative taxane dose DC regimen there was no significant benefit from Anth (cumulative dose of epirubicin≈300mg/m2): RR 0.93, 95%CI 0.80-1.07; p>0.1. In sub-group analyses of all trials, the benefit of anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy persisted throughout years 0-1, 2-4 and 5-9 with little data beyond year 10. There was a similar and highly significant proportional reduction in recurrence in ER-positive and in ER-negative disease and the RRs for recurrence did not differ significantly by any other pre-specified group including age, nodal status, tumor diameter, grade and HER2 status. There were no significant increases in deaths from cardiovascular disease or leukaemia, though longer follow-up is needed to fully assess risks. Conclusion: The addition of anthracycline to taxane chemotherapy, compared to taxane alone reduced the risk of breast cancer recurrence by 18% with larger proportional reductions in trials of DC ± concurrent Anth, in which the taxane dose was the same in both groups and the cumulative anthracycline dose was higher. Citation Format: Jeremy Braybrooke, Rosie Bradley, Richard Gray, Robert Hills, Zulian Liu, Hongchao Pan, Richard Peto, Joanne Blum, Xiaosong Chen, Bent Ejlertsen, Wolfgang Janni, Ulrike Nitz, Dennis Slamon, Masakazu Toi, Toru Watanabe, Sandra Swain, Jonas Bergh, on behalf of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Taxane with anthracycline versus taxane without anthracycline: An individual patient-level meta-analysis of 16,500 women with early-stage breast cancer in 13 randomised trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-06.

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3