Diagnostic Mammography Performance across Racial and Ethnic Groups in a National Network of Community-Based Breast Imaging Facilities

Author:

Nyante Sarah J.12ORCID,Abraham Linn3ORCID,Aiello Bowles Erin J.3ORCID,Lee Christoph I.45ORCID,Kerlikowske Karla678ORCID,Miglioretti Diana L.39ORCID,Sprague Brian L.10,Henderson Louise M.12ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

2. 2Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

3. 3Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington.

4. 4Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

5. 5Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.

6. 6Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

7. 7Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

8. 8General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California, San Francisco, California.

9. 9Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, California.

10. 10Department of Surgery and University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.

Abstract

Abstract Background: We evaluated differences in diagnostic mammography performance based on women's race/ethnicity. Methods: This cohort study included 267,868 diagnostic mammograms performed to evaluate screening mammogram findings at 98 facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium between 2005 and 2017. Mammogram assessments were recorded prospectively and breast cancers occurring within one year were ascertained. Performance statistics were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each racial/ethnic group. Multivariable regression was used to control for personal characteristics and imaging facility. Results: Among non-Hispanic White (70%), non-Hispanic Black (13%), Asian/Pacific Islander (10%), and Hispanic (7%) women, the invasive cancer detection rate (iCDR, per 1,000 mammograms) and positive predictive value (PPV2) were highest among non-Hispanic White women (iCDR, 35.8; 95% CI, 35.0–36.7; PPV2, 27.8; 95% CI, 27.3–28.3) and lowest among Hispanic women (iCDR, 22.3; 95% CI, 20.2–24.6; PPV2, 19.4; 95% CI, 18.0–20.9). Short interval follow-up recommendations were most common among non-Hispanic Black women [(31.0%; 95% CI, 30.6%–31.5%) vs. other groups, range, 16.6%–23.6%]. False-positive biopsy recommendations were most common among Asian/Pacific Islander women [per 1,000 mammograms: 169.2; 95% CI, 164.8–173.7) vs. other groups, range, 126.5–136.1]. Some differences were explained by adjusting for receipt of diagnostic ultrasound or MRI for iCDR and imaging facility for short-interval follow-up. Other differences changed little after adjustment. Conclusions: Diagnostic mammography performance varied across racial/ethnic groups. Addressing characteristics related to imaging facility and access, rather than personal characteristics, may help reduce some of these disparities. Impact: Diagnostic mammography performance studies should include racially and ethnically diverse populations to provide an accurate view of the population-level effects.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Racial and Ethnic Variation in Diagnostic Mammography Performance among Women Reporting a Breast Lump;Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention;2023-07-13

2. Disparities in Breast Cancer Outcomes and How to Resolve Them;Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America;2023-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3