Optimized Systematic Review Tool: Application to Candidate Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Author:

U Mei Ran Abellona1ORCID,Shen Eric Yi-Liang12ORCID,Cartlidge Caroline3ORCID,Alkhatib Alzhraa14ORCID,Thursz Mark R.1ORCID,Waked Imam4ORCID,Gomaa Asmaa I.4ORCID,Holmes Elaine15ORCID,Sharma Rohini6ORCID,Taylor-Robinson Simon D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

3. 3Harrogate District Hospital, Harrogate, United Kingdom.

4. 4National Liver Unit, Menoufiya University, Shbeen El Kom, Egypt.

5. 5Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth WA, Australia.

6. 6Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Abstract This review aims to develop an appropriate review tool for systematically collating metabolites that are dysregulated in disease and applies the method to identify novel diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies that analyzed metabolites in blood or urine samples where HCC was compared with comparison groups (healthy, precirrhotic liver disease, cirrhosis) were eligible. Tumor tissue was included to help differentiate primary and secondary biomarkers. Searches were conducted on Medline and EMBASE. A bespoke “risk of bias” tool for metabolomic studies was developed adjusting for analytic quality. Discriminant metabolites for each sample type were ranked using a weighted score accounting for the direction and extent of change and the risk of bias of the reporting publication. A total of 84 eligible studies were included in the review (54 blood, 9 urine, and 15 tissue), with six studying multiple sample types. High-ranking metabolites, based on their weighted score, comprised energy metabolites, bile acids, acylcarnitines, and lysophosphocholines. This new review tool addresses an unmet need for incorporating quality of study design and analysis to overcome the gaps in standardization of reporting of metabolomic data. Validation studies, standardized study designs, and publications meeting minimal reporting standards are crucial for advancing the field beyond exploratory studies.

Funder

UK Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council

Chang Gung Medical Research Grant

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3