Associations of Healthcare Affordability, Availability, and Accessibility with Quality Treatment Metrics in Patients with Ovarian Cancer

Author:

Akinyemiju Tomi F.12ORCID,Wilson Lauren E.1ORCID,Diaz Nicole1ORCID,Gupta Anjali1,Huang Bin3,Pisu Maria4ORCID,Deveaux April1ORCID,Liang Margaret45,Previs Rebecca A.6ORCID,Moss Haley A.6,Joshi Ashwini1,Ward Kevin C.7,Schymura Maria J.8ORCID,Berchuck Andrew6,Potosky Arnold L.9

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

2. 2Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

3. 3Department of Biostatistics and Kentucky Cancer Registry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

4. 4Division of Preventive Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

5. 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

6. 6Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

7. 7Georgia Cancer Registry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

8. 8New York State Department of Health, New York State Cancer Registry, Albany, New York.

9. 9Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC.

Abstract

AbstractBackground:Differential access to quality care is associated with racial disparities in ovarian cancer survival. Few studies have examined the association of multiple healthcare access (HCA) dimensions with racial disparities in quality treatment metrics, that is, primary debulking surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist and initiation of guideline-recommended systemic therapy.Methods:We analyzed data for patients with ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2008 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database. We defined HCA dimensions as affordability, availability, and accessibility. Modified Poisson regressions with sandwich error estimation were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) for quality treatment.Results:The study cohort was 7% NH-Black, 6% Hispanic, and 87% NH-White. Overall, 29% of patients received surgery and 68% initiated systemic therapy. After adjusting for clinical variables, NH-Black patients were less likely to receive surgery [RR, 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.98]; the observed association was attenuated after adjusting for healthcare affordability, accessibility, and availability (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77–1.08). Dual enrollment in Medicaid and Medicare compared with Medicare only was associated with lower likelihood of receiving surgery (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76–0.97) and systemic therapy (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92–0.97). Receiving treatment at a facility in the highest quartile of ovarian cancer surgical volume was associated with higher likelihood of surgery (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04–1.21).Conclusions:Racial differences were observed in ovarian cancer treatment quality and were partly explained by multiple HCA dimensions.Impact:Strategies to mitigate racial disparities in ovarian cancer treatment quality must focus on multiple HCA dimensions. Additional dimensions, acceptability and accommodation, may also be key to addressing disparities.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3