Affiliation:
1. 1Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California and
2. 2Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives: Models previously developed for predicting lung cancer mortality from cigarette smoking intensity and duration based on aggregated prospective mortality data have employed a study of British doctors and have assumed a uniform age of initiation of smoking. We reexamined these models using the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study I data that include a range of ages of initiation to assess the importance of an additional term for age. Methods: Model parameters were estimated by maximum likelihood, and model fit was assessed by residual analysis, likelihood ratio tests, and χ2 goodness-of-fit tests. Results: Examination of the residuals of a model proposed by Doll and Peto with the Cancer Prevention Study I data suggested that a better fitting model might be obtained by including an additional term specifying the ages when smoking exposure occurred. An extended model with terms for cigarettes smoked per day, duration of smoking, and attained age was found to fit statistically significantly better than the Doll and Peto model (P < 0.001) and to fit well in an absolute sense (goodness-of-fit; P = 0.34). Finally, a model proposed by Moolgavkar was examined and found not to fit as well as the extended model, although it included similar terms (goodness-of-fit; P = 0.007). Conclusions: The addition of age, or another measure of the timing of the exposure to smoking, improves the prediction of lung cancer mortality with Doll and Peto's multiplicative power model.
Publisher
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Reference30 articles.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the health consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. Department of Health and Human Services Publication No. (CDC) 89-8411; 1989.
2. Doll R, Peto R. Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1978;32:303-13.
3. Artimage P, Doll R. Stochastic models for carcinogenesis. Proceedings Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 4. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1961. p. 19-38.
4. Doll R, Hill AB. Mortality in relation to smoking: ten years observations of British doctors. BMJ 1964;1:1399-410, 1460-7.
5. Moolgavkar SH, Dewanji A, Luebeck G. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: reanalysis of the British doctors' data. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:415-20.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献