Affiliation:
1. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
Abstract
Abstract
As in other areas of epidemiology, researchers studying physical activity and cancer have begun to include laboratory analyses of biological specimens in their studies. The incorporation of these “biomarkers” into epidemiology has been termed molecular epidemiology and is an approach primarily developed to study chemical carcinogens. Thus far, there has been no discussion in the field on how the established molecular epidemiologic framework might be adapted for research into physical activity, what methodologic needs exist, what the goals of such an approach might be, and what limitations exist. This article relates the literature on molecular epidemiology to the needs of physical activity research and tries to set research priorities for the field as it moves in this new direction. Although this approach will be very useful for investigating the mechanisms through which physical activity exerts effects, there are several challenges for physical activity epidemiologists in adapting molecular epidemiologic approaches. Primarily, there are currently no available biomarkers that might be considered measures of exposure or biologically effective dose. In addition, most available biomarkers of intermediate effects have been tested in training studies at activity levels much higher than those seen in population-based epidemiologic studies. Thus, it is not clear whether these biomarkers are valid at lower activity levels. Furthermore, the nature of the relationship between activity and many available biomarkers depends very much on the context of the activity. Addressing these issues should be a priority if we are to develop a molecular epidemiologic paradigm for studying physical activity.
Publisher
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Reference121 articles.
1. Hoffman-Goetz L, Apter D, Denmark-Wahnefried W, Goran M, McTiernan A, Reichman M. Possible mechanisms mediating an association between physical activity and breast cancer. Cancer 1998;83:621–8.
2. McTiernan A, Ulrich C, Slate S, Potter S. Physical activity and cancer etiology: associations and mechanisms. Cancer Causes Control 1998;9:487–509.
3. McTiernan A, Schwartz R, Potter J, Bowen D. Exercise clinical trials in cancer prevention research: a call to action. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:201–7.
4. Thune I. Assessments of physical activity and cancer risk. Eur J Can Prev 2000;9:387–93.
5. Perera FP, Weinstein IB. Molecular epidemiology and carcinogen-DNA adduct detection: new approaches to studies of human cancer causation. J Chronic Dis 1982;35:581–600.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献