Bilateral Oophorectomy and Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the Women's Health Initiative

Author:

Song Mihae1ORCID,Nelson Rebecca A.2ORCID,Kruper Laura3ORCID,Mortimer Joanne4ORCID,Luo Juhua5ORCID,Jung Su Yon6ORCID,Wallace Robert B.7ORCID,Chlebowski Rowan8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

2. 2Division of Information Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

3. 3Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

4. 4Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

5. 5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, School of Public Health, Bloomington, Indiana.

6. 6UCLA School of Nursing, Westwood, California.

7. 7Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa.

8. 8The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California.

Abstract

Abstract Background: The few cohort studies examining oophorectomy and colorectal cancer risk provide mixed results. Therefore, we examined this issue in Women's Health Initiative Observational Study participants. Methods: A total of 71,312 postmenopausal women were followed for 22.1 years (median). At enrollment, 55,643 (78%) had intact ovaries and 15,669 (22%) had undergone a bilateral oophorectomy. Colorectal cancers were verified by central medical record review with mortality findings enhanced by National Death Index queries. Results: With 1,421 incident colorectal cancers, 450 colorectal cancer-specific mortalities, after controlling for covariates, bilateral oophorectomy was not associated with colorectal cancer incidence or colorectal cancer mortality. Conclusions: No significant associations between oophorectomy and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality were seen in a large cohort study with long follow-up. Impact: As the oophorectomy and colorectal cancer question remains open, further studies of high quality, even with null findings, should be encouraged.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3