Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Are There Racial Disparities in Use and Survival?

Author:

Amin Saber A.1ORCID,Collin Lindsay J.2ORCID,Setoguchi Soko3ORCID,Satagopan Jaya M.14ORCID,Buckley de Meritens Alexandre56ORCID,Bandera Elisa V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

2. 2Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

3. 3Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

4. 4Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.

5. 5Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

6. 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Abstract

Abstract Background: We investigated racial and ethnic disparities in treatment sequence [i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus interval debulking surgery (IDS) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) plus adjuvant chemotherapy] among patients with ovarian cancer and its contribution to disparities in mortality. Methods: Study included 37,566 women ages ≥18 years, diagnosed with stage III/IV ovarian cancer from the National Cancer Database (2004–2017). Logistic regression was used to compute ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for racial and ethnic disparities in treatment sequence. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% CI for racial and ethnic disparities in all-cause mortality. Results: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Asian women were more likely to receive NACT plus IDS relative to PDS plus adjuvant chemotherapy than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02–1.22 and OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.99–1.28, respectively). Compared with NHW women, NHB women had increased hazard of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09–1.20), whereas Asian and Hispanic women had a lower hazard of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74–0.88 and HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77–0.88, respectively), which did not change after accounting for treatment sequence. Conclusions: NHB women were more likely to receive NACT plus IDS and experience a higher all-cause mortality rates than NHW women. Impact: Differences in treatment sequence did not explain racial disparities in all-cause mortality. Further evaluation of racial and ethnic differences in treatment and survival in a cohort of patients with detailed treatment information is warranted.

Funder

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Reference41 articles.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3