Trends and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening among US Women Ages 30–64 Years

Author:

Sokale Itunu O.12ORCID,Montealegre Jane R.23ORCID,Oluyomi Abiodun O.12ORCID,Thrift Aaron P.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

2. 2Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

3. 3Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Cervical cancer screening (CCS) participation has decreased in the United States over the last several decades, contributing to cervical cancer's sustained incidence and mortality. This study examined recent trends and racial/ethnic differences in predictors of CCS uptake among US women. Methods: We analyzed combined data from the 2016 to 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and included 235,713 women ages 30 to 64 years without a hysterectomy. We used simple linear regression to assess trends over time and multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate racial/ethnic differences in predictors of up-to-date CCS. Results: We found little change in CCS over the 5-year interval and screening rates disparities among racial minority women. The overall population showed stable CCS completion rates from 2016 to 2018 (84.2% vs. 84.6%), and then a small dip from 2018 to 2020 (from 84.6% to 83.3%). Despite a slight decline in 2020, HPV-based testing increased significantly among all subgroups and overall, from 2016 to 2020 (from 43.4% to 52.7%). Multivariable regression models showed racial/ethnic differences in predictors of CCS. Across all racial/ethnic subgroups, older women were less likely to receive timely screening. Women who had routine check-ups had higher odds of being up to date. However, the link between CCS and socioeconomic status varied. Conclusions: Age and racial/ethnic disparities persist in CCS, and predictors of screening vary. Notwithstanding, routine health examinations was positively associated with screening regardless of race/ethnicity. Impact: Our analyses suggest that leveraging primary care to optimize CCS uptake may reduce gaps in screening.

Funder

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Reference42 articles.

1. Cervical cancer screening in Switzerland: cross-sectional trends (1992–2012) in social inequalities;Burton-Jeangros;Eur J Public Health,2017

2. Factors influencing recommended cancer screening in low-income African American women in Tennessee;Patel;J Racial Ethn Health Disparities,2020

3. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening;Cuzick;Int J Cancer,2006

4. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries;Sung;CA Cancer J Clin,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3