Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer

Author:

Mierzwa Michelle L.1ORCID,Aryal Madhava1ORCID,Lee Choonik1ORCID,Schipper Matthew2ORCID,VanTil Monica2ORCID,Morales Krystal1ORCID,Swiecicki Paul L.3ORCID,Casper Keith A.4ORCID,Malloy Kelly M.4ORCID,Spector Matthew E.4ORCID,Shuman Andrew G.4ORCID,Chinn Steven B.4ORCID,Prince Mark E.P.4ORCID,Stucken Chaz L.4ORCID,Rosko Andrew J.4ORCID,Lawrence Theodore S.1ORCID,Brenner J. Chad4ORCID,Rosen Benjamin1ORCID,Schonewolf Caitlin A.1ORCID,Shah Jennifer1ORCID,Eisbruch Avraham1ORCID,Worden Francis P.3ORCID,Cao Yue1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

2. 2Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

3. 3Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

4. 4Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: We conducted a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that physiologic MRI-based radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation would improve the outcome of patients with poor prognosis head and neck cancer. Patients and Methods: MRI was acquired at baseline and at RT fraction 10 to create low blood volume/apparent diffusion coefficient maps for RT boost subvolume definition in gross tumor volume. Patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy (standard RT) or 80 Gy to the boost subvolume (RT boost) with concurrent weekly platinum. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with significance defined at a one-sided 0.1 level, and secondary endpoints included locoregional failure (LRF), overall survival (OS), comparison of adverse events and patient reported outcomes (PRO). Results: Among 81 randomized patients, neither the primary endpoint of DFS (HR = 0.849, P = 0.31) nor OS (HR = 1.19, P = 0.66) was significantly improved in the RT boost arm. However, the incidence of LRF was significantly improved with the addition of the RT boost (HR = 0.43, P = 0.047). Two-year estimates [90% confidence interval (CI)] of the cumulative incidence of LRF were 40% (27%–53%) in the standard RT arm and 18% (10%–31%) in the RT boost arm. Two-year estimates (90% CI) for DFS were 48% (34%–60%) in the standard RT arm and 57% (43%–69%) in the RT boost arm. There were no significant differences in toxicity or longitudinal differences seen in EORTC QLQ30/HN35 subscales between treatment arms in linear mixed-effects models. Conclusions: Physiologic MRI-based RT boost decreased LRF without a significant increase in grade 3+ toxicity or longitudinal PRO differences, but did not significantly improve DFS or OS. Additional improvements in systemic therapy are likely necessary to realize improvements in DFS and OS.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3