A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Sodium Bicarbonate Buffered 2% Lidocaine With 1 : 100,000 Epinephrine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks

Author:

Whitcomb Michael1,Drum Melissa2,Reader Al3,Nusstein John4,Beck Mike5

Affiliation:

1. Private Practice, Endodontics, Worthington, Ohio

2. Assistant Professor, Division of Endodontics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

3. Professor and Program Director of Graduate Endodontics, Division of Endodontics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

4. Associate Professor and Chair, Division of Endodontics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

5. Associate Emeritus Professor, Division of Oral Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Abstract

Abstract The authors, using a crossover design, randomly administered, in a double-blind manner, inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) blocks using a buffered 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine/sodium bicarbonate formulation and an unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine formulation at 2 separate appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. An electric pulp tester was used in 4-minute cycles for 60 minutes to test for anesthesia of the first and second molars, premolars, and lateral and central incisors. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained within 15 minutes, and the 80 reading was continuously sustained for 60 minutes. For the buffered 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine/sodium bicarbonate formulation, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 10–71%. For the unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine formulation, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 10–72%. No significant differences between the 2 anesthetic formulations were noted. The buffered lidocaine formulation did not statistically result in faster onset of pulpal anesthesia or less pain during injection than did the unbuffered lidocaine formulation. We concluded that buffering a 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine with sodium bicarbonate, as was formulated in the current study, did not statistically increase anesthetic success, provide faster onset, or result in less pain of injection when compared with unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for an IAN block.

Publisher

American Dental Society of Anesthesiology (ADSA)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Conduction block analgesia in the mandible.;Ågren;Swed Dent J,1981

2. An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block.;Vreeland;J Endod,1989

3. An evaluation of 4% prilocaine with 1 : 200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with levonordefrin compared to 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.;Hinkley;Anesth Prog,1991

4. An evaluation of lidocaine hydrocarbonate compared with lidocaine hydrochloride for inferior alveolar nerve block.;Chaney;Anesth Prog,1991

5. An evaluation of the incisive nerve block and combination inferior alveolar and incisive nerve blocks in mandibular anesthesia.;Nist;J Endod,1992

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3