Affiliation:
1. ZAKŁAD POŁOŻNICTWA I PATOLOGII CIĄŻY POMORSKIEGO UNIWERSYTETU MEDYCZNEGO W SZCZECINIE, WYDZIAŁ NAUK O ZDROWIU, SZCZECIN, POLSKA
Abstract
Introduction: In last year the proportion of caesarean sections constantly growing.
The aim: To evaluate the knowledge in the questionnaire survey of women about the Caesarean section.
Materials and methods: 1462 women in age 18-57 were tested by the method of diagnostic survey. The tool of research was own survey composed of 26 question.
Results: Among 1462 of women, which was poll, 79,6% described anxiety as the main factor to make a decision to have a caesarean section. The most frequently mentioned
disease in 93,6%, which may appear among women after surgery were adhesions, while a delay of lactation in 59,36% has a negative influence on newborn children.
Conclusions: 1. The percentage increase of elective caesarean sections is related to the extension of procedures related to psychiatric indications. However, most women, still
prefer a natural birth because of safety for the mother and the child.
2. The awareness of women with higher education causes a higher percentage of cesarian sections, because of the greater anxiety about their own health, health of the newborn
and safety of a natural birth.
3. Women in a reproductive age should have access to literature and antenatal schools, but also to psychoeducational meetings and a detailed discussion on this subject of
both forms of delivery.
4. Increasing the number of cesarean sections to avoid criminal, civil and professional liability contributes to the increase of awareness and claims and by the knowledge of the law by the society.
Reference20 articles.
1. 1. Simm A, Mathew D. Caesarean section: techniques and complicaions. Obstrectics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine. 2008;6:448-455.
2. 2. Nowacki R. Od mitologii do wspołczesności - z historii cięcia cesarskiego. Perinatol Neonatol Ginekol. 2008;5-7.
3. 3. Cunningham FG, Grant NF, Lerumo KJ et al. Abnormal labour: Williams’ Obstetrics 21 st edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2001:425-451.
4. 4. Stasiełuk A, Langiewicz I, Kosińska-Kaczyńska K et al. Czy epidemia cięć cesarskich jest wykładnikiem liberalizacji wskazań? Ginekol Pol. 2012;83:604-608.
5. 5. OECD Indicators. Health at a Glance, OECD Publishing; 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2013-39-en [dostęp: 27.01.2016]