AN ATTEMPT TO ASSESS WOMEN'S KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CAESAREAN SECTION IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY

Author:

Zielińska Patrycja1,Janik Inga1,Maciejewska Martyna1,Sipak Olimpia1

Affiliation:

1. ZAKŁAD POŁOŻNICTWA I PATOLOGII CIĄŻY POMORSKIEGO UNIWERSYTETU MEDYCZNEGO W SZCZECINIE, WYDZIAŁ NAUK O ZDROWIU, SZCZECIN, POLSKA

Abstract

Introduction: In last year the proportion of caesarean sections constantly growing. The aim: To evaluate the knowledge in the questionnaire survey of women about the Caesarean section. Materials and methods: 1462 women in age 18-57 were tested by the method of diagnostic survey. The tool of research was own survey composed of 26 question. Results: Among 1462 of women, which was poll, 79,6% described anxiety as the main factor to make a decision to have a caesarean section. The most frequently mentioned disease in 93,6%, which may appear among women after surgery were adhesions, while a delay of lactation in 59,36% has a negative influence on newborn children. Conclusions: 1. The percentage increase of elective caesarean sections is related to the extension of procedures related to psychiatric indications. However, most women, still prefer a natural birth because of safety for the mother and the child. 2. The awareness of women with higher education causes a higher percentage of cesarian sections, because of the greater anxiety about their own health, health of the newborn and safety of a natural birth. 3. Women in a reproductive age should have access to literature and antenatal schools, but also to psychoeducational meetings and a detailed discussion on this subject of both forms of delivery. 4. Increasing the number of cesarean sections to avoid criminal, civil and professional liability contributes to the increase of awareness and claims and by the knowledge of the law by the society.

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. 1. Simm A, Mathew D. Caesarean section: techniques and complicaions. Obstrectics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine. 2008;6:448-455.

2. 2. Nowacki R. Od mitologii do wspołczesności - z historii cięcia cesarskiego. Perinatol Neonatol Ginekol. 2008;5-7.

3. 3. Cunningham FG, Grant NF, Lerumo KJ et al. Abnormal labour: Williams’ Obstetrics 21 st edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2001:425-451.

4. 4. Stasiełuk A, Langiewicz I, Kosińska-Kaczyńska K et al. Czy epidemia cięć cesarskich jest wykładnikiem liberalizacji wskazań? Ginekol Pol. 2012;83:604-608.

5. 5. OECD Indicators. Health at a Glance, OECD Publishing; 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2013-39-en [dostęp: 27.01.2016]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3