Affiliation:
1. Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Abstract
Aim: To analyze the reasons of low rehabilitation efficiency of persons with disabilities after musculoskeletal injuries.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of the 102 people’s records whose permanent disability is extended after next certification was conducted.
Results: Only 31.4% persons reduced the severity of disability. The rest remained unchanged (67.6%) or deteriorated (1.0%). Permanent disability after musculoskeletal injuries is typical for men (86.3%), villagers (74.5%), working age (99.0%), of which 37.5% – men under 40 years. Near half persons (45.1%) have passed the next re-examination more than 3 times; in 52.0% ones four or more years have passed after injury; in 9.8% cases the continuation of rehabilitation is considered as hopeless. Defects in the implementation of rehabilitation measures were revealed, namely: excessive use of drugs with insufficient evidence of effectiveness (85.3-88.2%), inadequate coverage of physical therapy and occupational therapy (56.4%), a formal approach to the individual rehabilitation programs (IRP) formation, in particular in the assessment of rehabilitation potential (100.0%), the degree of movement restrictions (20.6%), social and labor rehabilitation (36.3%). Despite the fact that the majority of the observed people (86.3%) were recognized as capable for work, only 63.7% were provided with advice on rational employment, and 78.4% of them do not work.
Conclusions: Improving of the rehabilitation effectiveness requires comprehensive integrated solutions at the state level in order to change approaches to assessing the degree of disability, the formation and implementation of IRP based on modern world standards.
Reference19 articles.
1. 1. Pransky GS, Fassier JB, Besen E et al. The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention. Sustaining work participation across the life course. J Occup Rehab. 2016;26:465. doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9670-1.
2. 2. Papadakaki M, Tsalkanis A, Sarris M et al. Physical, psychological and economic burden of two-wheel users after a road traffic injury: Evidence from intensive care units of three EU countries. J Safety Res. 2018;67:155. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.10.005.
3. 3. Macpherson RA, Lane TJ, Collie A et al. Age, sex, and the changing disability burden of compensated work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Canada and Australia. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:758. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5590-7.
4. 4. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Seattle, WA: IHME. 2018, 120р..
5. 5. Assessment of the system of life restriction and rehabilitation in Ukraine. Summary of the report of the WHO advisory mission – the International Society for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Ukrainian Bulletin of Medical and Social Expertise. 2016;1:5-21. https://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ujmse_2016_1_8 [date access 25.09.2021]
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献