THE PATENTABILITY OF BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INVENTIONS IN THE EU: AN IMPACT ON THERAPEUTIC PRACTICE

Author:

Komarova Tetyana V.1

Affiliation:

1. YAROSLAV MUDRYI NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, KHARKIV, UKRAINE

Abstract

The aim: To identify the spheres in which it is forbidden to patent the results of medical researches and as a consequence there is no legal protection of biotechnological inventions. Materials and methods: The research material is a modern European regulatory framework that establishes the basic principles for patentability of biotechnological inventions. The methods of information retrieval, analysis, systematization, and generalization were used in this article. Conclusions: The Court of Justice has categorically stated that inventions that use human embryonic cells cannot be used for industrial or commercial purposes and therefore cannot be patented. In connection with this prohibition, the Court of Justice provided a unified definition of “embryo” and determined that it could be considered a dividing human egg, but only if it had a real ability to develop into a human. That is, the determining factor is not the beginning of the process of cell proliferation, but their real ability to become human. These decisions have become crucial for the development of research and the use of their results in therapeutic activities in the EU.

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. 1. Schwartz R.M, Minssen T. Life after Myriad: the uncertain future of patenting biomedical innovation and personalised medicine in an international context. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2015; 3:189-241.

2. 2. Baeyens A, Goffin T. European Court of Justice: case C-364/13, International Stem Cell Corp v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. European Journal of Health Law. 2015; 22(2):141-164.

3. 3. Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. Official Journal. L. 213, 30.7.1998: 13–21.

4. 4. Min Y. Morality - an equivocal area in the patent system. European Intellectual Property Review. 2012; 34(4): 261-265.

5. 5. Judgment С-377/98, Netherlands v Parliament and Council. European Court Review: I – 7149.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3