SOMATIC (PERSONAL) HUMAN RIGHTS: THE RATIO OF MEDICAL AND LEGAL CATEGORIES

Author:

Adamovsky Volodymyr I.1,Chornenka Danyila S.2,Fonaryuk Olena U.3,Pohoryelova Zoya О.4

Affiliation:

1. KAMIANETS-PODІLSKYI IVAN OHIIENKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, KAMIANETS-PODІLSKYI ,UKRAINE

2. V.M.KORETCSKY INSTITUTE OF STATE AND LAW OF NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE

3. L’VIV UNIVERSITY OF TRADE AND ECONOMICS, LVIV, UKRAINE

4. STATE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT «UZHHOROD NATIONAL UNIVERSITY», UZHHOROD, UKRAINE

Abstract

The aim: To find out the peculiarities of somatic (personal) human rights, while combining the basic principles of medicine and law. Materials and methods: Formal-logical methods of analysis and synthesis allowed to reveal the content of the concepts that make up the subject of research, to classify them, as well as to formulate intermediate and general conclusions. The systematic method allowed to study the role and significance of somatic rights among other human rights and freedoms. Using the historical method, the doctrinal basis of the study was analyzed, and the main periods of the formation of somatic rights in the works of scientists. The application of the above-mentioned methods necessitates the inclusion of an activity method in the research methodology (this method, becoming a logical continuation of the integral structural-functional method, involves the study of somatic rights through the development of medicine). Conclusions: We consider it expedient to use the term «somatic rights» and not «personal rights», firstly, due to the explanation of the danger of possible pluralism in social and humanitarian knowledge and the terminological similarity of the definition of «personal» rights with «personal» human rights and, secondly, due to the fact that when justifying the legal scientificity of the term «personal» rights, the main semantic load lies in the word «personality»; these are rights that have an individual, «purely personal character».

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. 1. Shadryn V.V. Problemi opredelenyia pravovoi pryrodi somatycheskykh prav. Molodoi uchoni [Problems of determining the legal nature of somatic rights]. 2015; 19 (99): 525-528. (in Russian)

2. 2. Bielov D.M., Petsa D.D., Svyshcho V.Y., Novytsky V.V. The human right to transplantation of organs and tissues: medicine, ethics and law. Wiad. Lek. 2022;75(10):2519-2524.

3. 3. Bielov D., Aristova I., Hromovchuk M. The History of the Paradigm of Constitutionalism at the Present Stage of Development of the Post- Soviet States (On the Example of Ukraine). Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series Historica. 2019:16:265-273.

4. 4. Bielov D.V., Hromovchuk M.V., Hreca Ya.V., Tymchak V.V. Essence of somatic human rights in the process of biomedical research. Wiad. Lek. 2021;75( 10): 2663-2668.

5. 5. Misko N.V. Rozvytok naukovoho tezaurusa vitchyznianoi teorii upravlinnia osvitoiu (ostannia chvert XX – pochatok XXI stolittia) [The development of the scientific thesaurus of the national theory of education management (the last quarter of the 20th – the beginning of the 21st century)]: dys. ... kand. ped. nauk : 13.00.06; Derzh. zakl. «Luhan. nats. un-t im. Tarasa Shevchenka». Starobilsk. 2016, 20. (in Russian)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3