CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF THE LIMITS OF PERMISSIBLE INTERVENTION IN CONDUCTING BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPATION

Author:

Lazur Yaroslav V.1,Kozodayev Sergiy P.1,Roshkanyuk Vadym M.1,Panov Alen V.1

Affiliation:

1. UZHHOROD NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, UZHHOROD, UKRAINE

Abstract

The aim: To find out the peculiarities of constitutional and legal principles of the limits of permissible intervention in conducting biomedical research with human participation. Materials and methods: The methodological basis of the study was worldview dialectical, general scientific and specific scientific methods of learning the phenomena of state and legal reality. Common ones were widely used in the work principles of scientific knowledge — comprehensiveness, objectivity, historicism, unity of theory and practice and others. The most important methodological prerequisite was a systemic approach to the issue of protecting human rights when conducting biomedical experiments with his participation, which made it possible to form a holistic view of the object and subject of research. With its help, the human rights affected by biomedical research in the context of the general legal principle of humanism were analyzed, the limits of permissible intervention in the human body were identified, and conclusions were drawn regarding the need for the separation and normative legal regulation of the complex branch of medical law. In the study, general scientific methods were widely used: historical, systematic analysis of the studied phenomena and syn¬thesis of the obtained results, inductive and deductive reasoning; special: formal-logical, sociological, statistical; and also private-scientific: comparative-legal, normative-legal, and others. Conclusions: 1) A key point in the mechanism of protection of the subject’s rights in the process of conducting biomedical research is the establishment of a number of limits (maxims) that allow interference in the human body and can limit the researcher and protect the subject. These maxims should be integral elements of the process of biomedical research with human participation and determine the basic criteria for the protection of citizens’ rights when conducting biomedical research. 2) The limits of permissible intervention in the conduct of biomedical research with human participation are the legal and factual consequences of the activity of bodies authorized to conduct biomedical research, which is based on the law and aimed at achieving the goals set by the researcher for conducting biomedical research with human participation, as a result of which the options for permitted by the norms of the law of behavior of the subjects of biomedical research by establishing various limits of such behavior, which necessarily have an exclusively temporary and subjective nature.

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. 1. Turner EV. Human rights suffer under camouflage of national security. http://www.state.ct.us/foi/Articles/human_right_suffer_under. htm [date access 17.04.2023]

2. 2. Irkha Yu. Obmezhennia konstytutsiinykh prav i svobod liudyny i hromadianyna v interesakh natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy v suchasnykh umovakh. [Limitation of the constitutional rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen in the interests of the national security of Ukraine in modern conditions]. Visnyk Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy. 2015;5: 78-87. (in Ukrainian).

3. 3. Bielov D, Aristova I, Hromovchuk M. The History of the Paradigm of Constitutionalism at the Present Stage of Development of the Post- Soviet States (On the Example of Ukraine). Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series Historica. 2019;16: 265-273. https://centers.ulbsibiu. ro/ccpisc/language/en/the-history-of-the-paradigm-of-constitutionalism-at-the-present-stage-of-development-of-the-post-soviet-states-on-the-example-of-ukraine/ [date access 17.04.2023]

4. 4. Rabinovych PM. Prava liudyny i hromadianyna [Human and citizen rights]. К. 2004, р.464. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vapny_2012_3_3 [date access 17.04.2023] (in Ukrainian).

5. 5. Aristova I, Zapara S, Bielov D et al. Legal Status of Local Self-government Authorities of Ukraine in the Conditions of Information Society Development: Research Methodology, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2019;10(8). doi: 10.14505/jarle.v10.8(46).02.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3