MODERN CONCEPT OF UNDERSTANDING THE HUMAN RIGHT TO LIFE

Author:

Dzhuska Anna V.1,Kaminska Natalіa V.2,Makarukha Zoryana M.3

Affiliation:

1. EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC HUMANITARIAN INSTITUTE OF V. I. VERNADSKY TAURIDA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, KYIV, UKRAINE

2. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE

3. GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR EUROPEAN AND EURO-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION, KYIV, UKRAINE

Abstract

The aim: The purpose of this article is to expose the essence of the concept of the human right to life, including in the content of this right, the duty of the state to maintain and develop general conditions for a dignified human life. Materials and methods: The article explores the modern concept of understanding the human right to life. The article analyzes the constitutions, other regulations, as well as the experience of different countries in the world on this issue (in particular, the countries of Western and Eastern Europe, Latin America, USA). The empirical basis of this research consists of two judgments of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine «On Judicial Practice in Cases of Crimes against the Life and Health of a Person» of February 7, 2003, № 2, and judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (Case of Lambert and others v. France of 5 June 2015, Case Hristozov and others v. Bulgaria of 13 November 2012, Case G. N. and others v. Italy of 01 December 2009) on issues related to the human right to life. The application of methods and techniques of scientific knowledge is conditioned by a systematic approach, which enables them to consider outlined problems in the unity of their social content and legal form. In particular, the formal-logical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative-legal method, formal legal and statistical methods are used. Conclusions: The modern approach to understanding the human right to life presupposes that it is the state’s responsibility to protect that right, to take appropriate measures to remedy the general conditions in society that may endanger life or prevent individuals from living a dignified life.

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. 1. Simić J. The protection of nasciturus within the civil law. Pravni zapisi. 2018; 9(2). doi: 10.5937/pravzap0-19193.

2. 2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948. 2019. https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf .

3. 3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966. 2019. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/ccpr.pdf .

4. 4. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 04 November 1950. 2019. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.

5. 5. La Constitución de España del 27 de diciembre de 1978. 2019. http://www.senado.es/web/conocersenado/normas/constitucion/index.html.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3