ANALYSIS OF DEFECTS IN THE FORENSIC MEDICAL ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES DISCOVERED DURING THE EXAMINATION OF PERSONS WHO DIED FROM TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Author:

Pletenetska Alina1,Varfolomeiev Yevhenii1,Demchenko Ivan1

Affiliation:

1. BOGOMOLETS NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, KYIV, UKRAINE

Abstract

The aim: To identify the main groups of expert defects that arise during the forensic assessment of changes detected during the examination of persons who died from a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Materials and methods: A total of 102 repeated commission forensic medical examinations with changed conclusions in corpses with TBI were analyzed. Data processing and analysis were conducted using statistical methods. Results: The examined forensic medical assessments of TBI with changed conclusions in corpses were categorized into the following groups: defects in estab¬lishing the diagnosis of TBI - 17.65±7.4%; defects in establishing the mechanism of TBI - 35.3±9.3%; defects in establishing the duration of TBI – 39.22±9.5%: sober - 20±12.4%; with alcohol intoxication - 80±12.4%. A combination of defects was found in 7.83±5.2% of cases. Defects that directly affected the experts’ incorrect establishment of the diagnosis, mechanism, and duration of TBI were also identified. Conclusions: The largest number of changed conclusions during the forensic medical examination of corpses in cases of TBI was due to the wrongly established duration of the trauma, accounting for 39.2±9.5%, with the vast majority of cases (80±12.4%) observed against the background of alcohol intoxication. The mechanism of trauma accounted for 35.3±9.3% of the changed conclusions. The main defects were incomplete collection of material for histological examination (90.2±5.8%) and incorrect interpretation of the results of histological examination (76.48±8.2%), along with the violation of the method of sectional examination (68.6±9.0%). Different groups of expert defects predominated in the cases with an incorrectly established diagnosis of TBI, duration of trauma, and mechanism.

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. 1. Wang Y, Chen Q, Dang X et al. A bibliometric analysis on traumatic brain injury in forensic medicine of a half-century (1972-2021). Frontiers in Neurology. 2023; 14: 913855. doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.913855.

2. 2. Murrey G, Starzinski D et al. The Forensic Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Handbook for Clinicians and Attorneys (2nd ed.). CRC Press. 2008, p.200.

3. 3. Ţolescu RS, Zorila MV, Şerbanescu MS et al. Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) - a seven-year comparative study in a Department of Forensic Medicine. Romanian Journal of Morphology & Embryology. 2020;61(1):95-103. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.1.10.

4. 4. Khyts AR. Cherepno-mozkova travma: rezultaty doslidzhennya CRASH-3 [Traumatic Brain Injury: CRASH-3 Preliminary Results]. Ukrayinskyy medychnyy chasopys. 2019. https://umj.com.ua/uk/novyna-165739-cherepno-mozkova-travma-rezultati-doslidzhennya-crash-3 [date access 17.01.2023] (in Ukrainian).

5. 5. Rules for conducting corps forensic medical examination in the forensic medical examination bureau: adopted by Ministry of Health of Ukraine Decree Num.6 on 17.01.1995. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en/z0257-95#Text [date access 17.01.2023] (in Ukrainian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3