Affiliation:
1. UZHHOROD NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, UZHHOROD, UKRAINE
2. UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN, DEBRECEN, HUNGARY
Abstract
Aim: To study the specifics of the impact of immediate intraoperative loading with a splinting component on supporting tissues during a one-stage implantation protocol.
Materials and Methods: In the course of the study, orthopedic treatment was carried out for 55 patients aged 29 to 60 years. The following were performed: cone-beam computed tomography, software planning and intraoral scanning with an optical scanner, one-stage implantation protocol, assessment of implant stability with the Osstell ISQ device, microcirculation study in the peri-implant area using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF).
Results: It was established that around loaded implants there is an increase in blood flow and vasomotor activity of the microcirculatory channel of the supporting tissues, an increase in the volume of bone tissue and an increase in torque, which is the optimal forecast for the acceleration of the pace of osseointegration.
Conclusions: The use of a splinting component during immediate intraoperative functional masticatory load accelerates the dynamics of bone tissue remodeling processes around the implant, which is an optimal prediction of osseointegration rates in various dental implantation protocols and is consistent with high values of the implant stability coefficient.
Reference28 articles.
1. 1. Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F et al. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12666.
2. 2. Potapchuk AM, Rusyn VV, Onipko YeL et al. Porivnyal’nyy analiz rivniv reduktsiyi peryimplantatnoyi kistkovoyi tkanyny pry realizatsiyi nehaynoho ta vidterminovanoho protokoliv dental’noyi implantatsiyi. [Comparative Analysis of Periumplant Bone Tissue Reduction Levels at Implementation of Dental and Immediatal Impalant Protocols]. Novyny stomatolohiyi. 2020;1:6-12. (Ukrainian)
3. 3. Tarazona B, Tarazona-Alvarez P, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago M. Relationship between indication for tooth extraction and outcome of immediate implants: A retrospective study with 5 years of follow-up. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(4):384-388. doi: 10.4317/jced.51616.
4. 4. Potapchuk AM, Onipko YL, Almashi VM, Hegedűs C. Сomparative evaluation of clinical application of monolithic and folding implants in rehabilitation of elderly patients with various degrees of atrophy of alveolar processes. Wiad Lek. 2022;75(4(2)):921-8.
5. 5. Montero J, Fernandez-Ruiz A, Pardal-Pelaez B et al. Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(3):802. doi: 10.3390/ma13030802.