Abuse of right during application of coercive medical measures in criminal proceedings

Author:

Navrotska Vira V.1,Horpyniuk Oksana P.1,Boreiko Halyna D.2

Affiliation:

1. LVIV STATE UNIVERSITY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS, LVIV, UKRAINE

2. DEPUTY PROSECUTOR OF LVIV REGION, LVIV, UKRAINE

Abstract

Aim: To determine the problematic issues of ensuring the rights and freedoms of persons suffering from mental disorders and to whom CMM are applied in criminal proceedings under the legislation of Ukraine and the legislation of the states that adhere to the modern concepts of international standards of human rights ensuring to a person the CMM are applied to Materials and Methods: Legal positions of the ECHR, criminal procedural legislation of a number of states, and a survey of scientists and practitioners conducted by the authors are used in this paper (total number of respondents was 168). A set of general scientific and special methods are used to achieve the aim of the study. Conclusions: The practice of applying СMM to persons suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings in Ukraine and other states does not fully meet international standards and needs improvement. It was suggested to make changes to the legal acts on the use of CMM in criminal proceedings.

Publisher

ALUNA

Reference26 articles.

1. 1. Scarpa F. The Italian reform of treatment of people not guilty by reason of insanity: The closure of forensic institutions Forensic Science International: Mind and Law. 2020; 1: 100016. doi:10.1016/j.fsiml.2020.100016.

2. 2. Lapkin AV, Yevtieieva DP, Karelin VV. International standards for application of compulsory medical measures. Wiadomości Lekarskie.2019; 72 (12):2579-2585. doi: 10.36740/WLek201912231.

3. 3. Tyshchenko OI, Leiba OA, Titko IA. European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings. Wiadomości Lekarskie. 2019; 72 (12): 2445-2451. doi: 10.36740/WLek201912209.

4. 4. Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care. General Assembly resolution 46/119 of 17 Dec. 1991. https://www.equalrightstrust.org/content/un-principles-protection-persons-mental-illness-and-improvementmental-health-care [date access 10.07.2023]

5. 5. Case of Winterwerp v. The Netherlands (Application no. 6301/73): Judgement European Court of Human Rights. 1979. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57597 [date access 10.07.2023]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3