Affiliation:
1. DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, STATE ESTABLISHMENT «ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL ACADEMY OF POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION OF HEALTH MINISTRY OF UKRAINE», ZAPOROZHYE, UKRAINE
2. DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, STATE ESTABLISHMENT “DNIPROPETROVSK MEDICAL ACADEMY OF HEALTH MINISTRY OF UKRAINE”, DNIPRO, UKRAINE
Abstract
Introduction: In the present article we draw a comparison between such types of regional anesthesia (RA) as unilateral spinal anesthesia (USA), traditional spinal anesthesia
(SA) and block anesthesia of peripheral nerve trunk (block anesthesia of sciatic nerve (BASN) on the side of operative intervention) during surgical treatment of patients with
the syndrome of diabetic foot.
The aim of the article is to compare effectiveness, reliability and safety of such methods of RA as unilateral and traditional spinal anesthesia, as well as block anesthesia of
sciatic nerve on the side of operative intervention.
Materials and methods: 96 patients with the syndrome of diabetic foot, who received treatment in the department of purulent surgery, were examined. All patients underwent
operative interventions of varying degrees of complexity depending on the nature and seriousness of damage degree of extremities, in terms of RA types under investigation.
Effectiveness of regional block anesthesia, the time when anesthesia takes effect, duration and deepness were evaluated.
Results: It should be noted that USA, as a variant of pain management during operations of foot, provides the most adequate level of surgical pain management in comparison
with the other types of anesthesia. During block anesthesia of sciatic nerve more than half of patients are not provided with 100% surgical analgesia, which can lead to additional
medicamentous analgosedation. According to the results obtained, pain sensitivity in patients after BASN is reliably higher than in patients after USA and SA in all stages of the study.
Conclusions: RA is the main method of choice during operations on foot in comparison with the methods of general anesthesia. Unilateral spinal anesthesia is carried out with
the use of smaller amount of anesthetic than traditional spinal anesthesia and block anesthesia of peripheral nerve trunk, which significantly reduces sympathectomy area and
leads to the stable hemodynamic during the peri-operative period.
Reference12 articles.
1. 1. Aqeel Ahmad, Khumair Asif, Muhammad Saleem. A Study of Risk Factors of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. P J M H S 2017; 11(1): 174 – 176.
2. 2. Aikaterini Trikkalinou, Athanasia K Papazafiropoulou, Andreas Melidonis. Type 2 diabetes and quality of life. World J Diabetes 2017; 8(4): 120-129.
3. 3. Shapoval S.D., Savon I.L., Maksymova O.O. Vyrazhennya diabetychnoyi nejropatiyi u hvoryh na czukrovyj diabet 2 typu pry syndromi diabetychnoyi stopy. Shpytalna hirurgiya 2014; № 3: 16-21.
4. 4. Calum D. Moulton, Christopher W.P. Hopkins, Khalida Ismail, Daniel Stahl. Repositioning of diabetes treatments for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Psichoneuroendocrinology 2018; 94: 91–103.
5. 5. Wei Xuan, James Hankin, Hailin Zhao, Shanglong Yao and Daqing Ma. The potential benefits of the use of regional anesthesia in cancer patients. International Journal of Cancer 2015: 2774–2784.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献