Farklı Çevrelerde Yetiştirilen Bazı Ekmeklik Buğday Çeşitlerinin (Triticum aestivum L.) Bazı Fizyolojik ve Verim Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi
Author:
ERKUL Ali1ORCID, ÖNCAN SÜMER Feride2ORCID, ÜNAY Aydın3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SULTANHİSAR MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, BİTKİSEL VE HAYVANSAL ÜRETİM BÖLÜMÜ 2. ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ 3. AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of some bread wheat varieties in different environments, and to reveal the relationships between some physiological parameters and yield and yield components. Three bread wheat varieties, (Namely, Basribey 95, Alibey, and Kaşifbey 95), were used as plant materials. Field experiments were conducted during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 growing seasons in Aydın and Menemen locations. The experimental layout was a RCBD with three replications at each location and year. In the study, canopy temperature depression (CTD), chlorophyll content (CC), stomatal conductance (SC), grain yield (GY), plant height (PH), spike number per square meter (S/m2), thousand kernel weight (TKW), test weight (TW), grain number per spike (G/S), single spike yield (SSY), number of days to heading (DHE), were examined. CTD in ZGS 65 had a decisive role in gaining high grain yield. Also, CC in ZGS 65 and ZGS 71 might be defined as an important physiological traits. On the other hand, the contribution of the SC parameter determined in ZGS 55, ZGS 65 and ZGS 71 to the yield depends on the environment. Those parameters could be selection criteria for high-yield wheat breeding due to positive and significant correlations with grain yield. And also SC and CC parameters might be used in yield estimation on wheat.
Funder
Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi
Publisher
COMU Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi
Reference47 articles.
1. Al-Ghzawi, A., Khalaf, Y., Al-Ajlouni, Z.I., Al-Quraan, N.A., Musallam, I., Hani, NB., (2018). The effect of supplemental irrigation on canopy temperature depression, chlorophyll content, and water use efficiency in three wheat (Triticum aestivum L. and T. Durum desf.) varieties grown in dry regions of Jordan. Agriculture 2018. 8(5): 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8050067 2. Akıncı, C., Yıldırım, M., Sönmez, N., (2001). Diyarbakır sulu koşullarina uygun ekmeklik buğday çeşit ve hatlarının belirlenmesi. Türkiye 4. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. Bildiriler Cilt: 1. 69-74. 17-21 Eylül, Tekirdağ. 3. Amani, I., Fischer, R.A., Reynolds, M.P, (1996). Evaluation of canopy temperature as a screening tool for heat tolerance in spring wheat. J.Agron.Crop Sci.176:119-129. 4. Ayeneh, A., M., Van Ginkel, M.P., Reynolds, K.A, (2002). Comparison of laf, spike, peduncle and canopy temperature depression in wheat under heat stress. Field Crops Research 79: 173-184. 5. Babar, M.A, Reynolds, M.P., Ginkel, M.V, Klatt, A.R, Raun, W.R, Stone, M.L, (2006). Spectral reflectance to estimate genetic variation for in-season biomass, leaf chlorophyll, and canopy temperature in wheat. Crop Sci. 46:1046-1057.
|
|