Missing risks in opportunistic screening for type 2 diabetes - CroDiabGP study

Author:

Vrca Botica Marija1,Carcaxhiu Linda2,Kern Josipa1,Kuehlein Thomas3,Botica Iva4,Gavran Larisa5,Zelić Ines6,Iliev Darko7,Haralović Dijana8,Vrca Anđelko9

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, University of Zagreb

2. University of Pristina

3. Institute of General Practice

4. University Hospital Zagreb

5. Education Center of Family Medicine Zenica, Primary Health Care Zenica

6. Private Family Practice Bukovje

7. PHO Medicinski Izgrev

8. Zagreb County Health Centre, Zagreb

9. Clinical Hospital Dubrava

Abstract

<p><strong>Aim<br /></strong> To examine two methods of extracting risks for undetected type 2 diabetes (T2D): derived from electronic medical record<br />(EMR) and family medicine (FM) assessment during pre-consultation phase. All risks were structured in three lists of patients’ data using Wonca International Classification Committee (WICC). Missing data were detected in each list.<br /><strong>Methods<br /></strong> A prospective study included a group of 1883 patients (aged 45-70) identified with risks. Risks were assessed based on<br />EMR for continuity variables and FM’s assessment for episodes of disease and personal related information. Patients were categorized with final diagnostic test in normoglycaemia, impaired fasting glycaemia and undetected T2D.<br /><strong>Results<br /></strong> Total prevalence of diabetes was 10.9% (new 1.4%), of which 59.3% were females; mean age was 57.4. The EMR risks<br />were hypertension in 1274 patients (yes 67.6%, no 27.9%, missing 4.4%), hypolipemic treatment in 690 (yes 36.6%, no 30.9%, miss 32.5%). In the episodes of disease: gestational diabetes mellitus in 31 women (yes 2.8%, missing 97.2%). Personal information: family history of diabetes in 649 (yes 34.5%, no 12.4%, missing 53.1%), overweight in 1412 (yes 75.0%, no 8.4%, missing 16.6%), giving birth to babies >4000g in 11 women (yes 0.9%, missing 99.1%). Overweight alone was the best predictor for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes, OR: 2.11 (CI: 1.41-3.15) (p<.001).<br /><strong>Conclusion<br /></strong> Two methods of extraction could not detect data for episodes of the disease. In the list of personal information, FMs<br />could not assess overweight for one in six patients and family history for every other patient. The study can stimulate improving coded and structured data in EMR.</p>

Publisher

Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj

Reference33 articles.

1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of response rates and diagnostic yield of screening for type diabetes and those at high risk of diabetes;KKhuntiK;Plos ONE,2015

2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation,2014. 18 February 2015

3. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2011;Diabetes Care,2011

4. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Lessons from the ADDITION Europe study;MVan Den DonkM;Diabet Med,2011

5. Diagnosis type 2 diabetes before patients complain of diabetic symptomsclinical opportunistic screening in a single general practice;PEvansP;Fam Pract,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3