Early career accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in evaluating rotator cuff tendon tears

Author:

Obeida Naser1ORCID,Al-Mnayyis Asma’a2,Bani Essa Suhaib1,Alkhatatba Mohammad1,Al Qudah Heba1,Aljarrah Majed M.1,Alshgerat Yahya1,Al-Tawarh Ammar1,Al-titi Raghad1,Alzuqaili Taqwa1,Samir Waseem1

Affiliation:

1. Jordan University of Science and Technology

2. Yarmouk University

Abstract

<p><strong>Aim <br /></strong>To compare the accuracy of shoulder ultrasound (US) in diagnosing rotator cuff tendon tears between junior and experienced musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists. Also, to compare the overall ultrasound accuracy referenced to MRI.<br /><strong>Methods</strong> <br />A retrospective data collection for patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff tears who underwent ultrasound from<br />June 2021 - June 2023 was conducted. Patients who also performed MRI for the same shoulder were only included in the study. US and MRI images were evaluated by two MSK radiologists with different experience levels. The diagnosis of rotator cuff tears was done on MRI through consensus. Ultrasound accuracy referenced to MRI was calculated for each radiologist. A second consensus was conducted for US images to calculate the overall US accuracy.<br />The percentage of agreement and Cohen’s kappa correlation coefficient were calculated before and after the US consensus.<br /><strong>Results</strong> <br />Forty-one patients were included in the study, 12 (29.3%) males and 29 (70.7%) females, with a mean age of 49.6 years. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracy of US interpreted by junior vs experienced MSK radiologists for supraspinatus full thickness tears (FTTs) were 100% vs 91%, 90% vs 93%, 79% vs 83%, 100% vs 97%, and 93% vs 93%, respectively. After the second consensus, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, and accuracy were 91%, 90%, 77%, 96%, and 90%, respectively.<br /><strong>Conclusion</strong> <br />The accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in diagnosing supraspinatus FTTs by junior MSK radiologists compares well to the<br />more experienced ones, but not for partial thickness tears (PTTs).</p>

Publisher

Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3