Affiliation:
1. Department of Otolaryngology, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2. Divisions of Health Services Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3. Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Abstract
Background Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis are cared for by multiple specialties. Endoscopy and imaging are important diagnostic tools. However, because physicians vary in their access to imaging and endoscopy, testing may vary across specialties. The purpose of this study is to characterize differences in use of imaging and endoscopy between physician specialties. Methods Using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we identified adult visits with primary, secondary, and tertiary diagnoses of chronic rhinosinusitis from 2005 through 2008. We measured rates of advanced radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, and PET) and office procedures. Logistic regression models were used to assess the bivariate and independent effects of patient, physician, and practice-level factors on use of advanced imaging and office procedures. Results There were nearly 51 million visits for diagnoses coded as chronic rhinosinusitis, representing an average of 12.7 million visits annually. Primary care providers saw the majority of these patients. Otolaryngologists used advanced radiographic imaging at a rate higher n primary care physicians per outpatient visit (16.0% versus 1.93%; p < 0.001). Office procedures, performed almost exclusively (99.2%) by otolaryngologists, were performed at 24.5% of otolaryngology visits. Private insurance was significantly associated with a lower use of advanced radiographic imaging (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.94) among otolaryngology visits, but no patient or provider-level variables were associated with office procedure use. Conclusion Radiographic imaging and office procedures are used at a higher rate per outpatient visit by otolaryngologists than by primary care providers. Additional studies are needed to identify and characterize factors that contribute to these different rates of use.
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology,Immunology and Allergy
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献