Physician- and patient-reported outcomes by hereditary angioedema type: Data from a real-world study

Abstract

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic condition characterized by painful and often debilitating swelling attacks. Little is known about the differences in outcomes between patients with HAE types I or II (type I: HAE caused by C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency; type II: HAE caused by C1 esterase inhibitor dysfunction), with decreased or dysfunctional C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH), and those with normal C1-INH (nC1-INH-HAE). Objective: To compare physician- and patient-reported real-world outcomes in patients with HAE types I/II versus patients with nC1-INH-HAE. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi HAE Disease Specific ProgrammeTM a real-world, cross-sectional survey of HAE-treating physicians and their patients in the United States conducted between July and November 2021. Physicians reported patient disease activity and severity, and recent attack history. Patient-reported outcomes were collected. Bivariate tests used were either the Student’s t-test, the Fisher exact test, or Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Physicians (N = 67) provided data on 368 patients (92.4% HAE types I/II and 7.6% nC1-INH-HAE). Physicians reported that a higher proportion of patients with nC1-INH-HAE had moderate or high disease activity and moderate or severe disease severity both at diagnosis and at data collection versus those with HAE types I/II. Patients with nC1-INH-HAE versus patients with HAE types I/II experienced increased attack severity (34.6% versus 4.4%) and hospitalization rate during the most recent attack (39.3% versus 6.6%), and reported lower health status and quality of life, via the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level (US tariff) and Angioedema Quality of Life, respectively. On average, 25% of the patients with nC1-INH-HAE reported absenteeism and work or activity impairment due to HAE compared with 2.7% of patients with HAE types I/II. Both patient groups reported improvements in disease activity and severity from diagnosis to the time of data collection. Conclusion: These real-world findings suggest that patients with nC1-INH-HAE have increased disease activity and severity, and experience greater impairment to their quality of life, work, and daily functioning than patients with HAE types I/II. Powered statistical analyses are required to confirm these findings.