Real-world reporting rates of administration-site reactions with on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks

Abstract

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent and unpredictable episodes of subcutaneous and/or submucosal swelling. Objective: To characterize the real-world treatment burden associated with existing on-demand therapies, we analyzed administration-site adverse drug reactions (ADR) associated with approved on-demand HAE therapies reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We searched the FAERS database from October 1, 2009, to March 31, 2022, for reports of all FDA-approved on-demand therapies for HAE: plasma-derived C1-inhibitor (pdC1-INH), ecallantide, icatibant, and recombinant C1-inhibitor (rhC1-INH). ADRs in which the drug was listed as the “primary suspect” were recorded for each drug. ADR preferred terms were grouped into 18 ADR domains based on semantic and/or clinical similarity, and the number of reports for each drug was calculated per year from the time of approval through March 2022, and descriptive results were presented. Preferred terms associated with administration-site ADRs identified from clinical trials and denoted on approved HAE drug U.S. package inserts were examined in a complementary analysis. Results: The highest reported rates of administration-site ADRs per year were site pain (17.9 reports per year), site erythema (7.4 per year), and site swelling (6.7 per year). RhC1-INH was the only drug for which access-site complications and/or malfunctions were reported (9.5 per year). PdC1-INH had the highest rate of incorrect route of product administration (3.7 per year). PdC1-INH showed statistically significant elevated reporting rate of injection-site reactions (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 3.59 [2.36‐5.46]; empirical Bayesian geometric mean [EBGM] 1.97 [1.39]). Icatibant and rhC1-INH showed a statistical trend toward an increased reporting rate of administration-site reactions. Conclusion: Real-world data from FAERS were generally consistent with adverse events reported in clinical trials and suggest that patients experience substantial treatment burden associated with FDA-approved parenteral on-demand therapies for HAE attacks. It should be noted that ADR rates are not exposure adjusted and are based on spontaneous reporting.