History of controlled trials in medicine: real priorities are little-known. Report 3. Quasi-randomized and randomized trials in humans and animals

Author:

Koterov A. N.1ORCID,Tikhonova O. A.1,Ushenkova L. N.1,Biryukov A. P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Russian State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Federal Medical Biological Agency

Abstract

The three-report review is aimed to describe the historical development of clinical trials, controlled trials (CT) and randomized controlled trials (RCT), and the inclusion of these approaches in health-related disciplines (Medicine and Epidemiology). Report 3 summarizes historical milestones (ideas and studies) for quasi-randomized CT (‘alternate allocation’; 88 milestones) and RCT (37 milestones). It was found that although the ideas of both designs are a thing of the past (from A. Lesassier Hamilton (1816) and J.B. Van Helmont (1648), respectively), the bulk of the tests were carried out in the 20th century, when both designs existed in parallel. Overall, the alternate allocation was used nearly three times longer than randomization.Analysis of the sources showed that the first RCT in medicine was the work of D. Colebrook, 1925 (Great Britain), and the first close to the modern RCT, including randomization according to the table of random numbers, was J.A. Bell, 1941 (USA). Often referred to as the ‘new era in CT’ and ‘the origine of RCT’, a study of the effects of streptomycin on tuberculosis in 1946–1948, which was also designed by A.B. Hill is only 13th known RCT, only 9th RCT in medicine and only the 2nd with modern randomization. Other facts of insufficient reflection of the priorities and real history of CT/RCT in West and Russian publications were found, including dozens of Western textbooks on epidemiology and evidence-based medicine of recent decades. True priorities are often omitted, and the most frequent references to the history of CT (progressively) are the experience of the prophet Daniel, the experience of the surgeon J. Lind, and the study on the effect of streptomycin on tuberculosis in 1946–1948.Based on a PubMed/MEDLINE search, a summary of alternate allocation CT, and RCT for the period 1960–1990 to 2020 is provided. In the first case, single publications were found, but the fact that design with alternation survives to this day is important. For RCT, since 1990s, an increase in the number of papers (up to tens of thousands per year) has been revealed. The data are given for the total number of RCTs performed by countries, continents and parts of the world for 2020. According to the calculated index of the ratio of the number of RCTs to the specific number of doctors (per 100,000 population) among 45 countries of Eurasia (from France to Tajikistan), Russia ranks 12th.A three-report review based on the originals of nearly all publications from the late 19th century and including the necessary references and citations can serve as a reference guide to the historical development of CT and related topics.

Publisher

IRBIS

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmacology

Reference224 articles.

1. Koterov A.N., Tikhonova O.A., Ushenkova L.N., Biryukov A.P. History of controlled trials in medicine: real priorities are little-known. Report 1. Basic concepts, terms, and disciplines that use medical experiment: historical and philosophical sources. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2021; 14 (1): 72–98 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2021.059.

2. Koterov A.N., Tikhonova O.A., Ushenkova L.N., Biryukov A.P. History of controlled trials in medicine: real priorities are little-known. Report 2. From early experiments to the present day: without alternation and randomization. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2021; 14 (3): 423–44 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2021.062.

3. Arditi C., Burnand B., Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Adding nonrandomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16 (1): 598. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1816-5.

4. Mayer D. Essential evidence-based medicine. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2010: 442 p. Available at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/56834431/dan-mayer-essential-evidence-basedmedicine (accessed 11.04.2021).

5. Jadad A.R., Enkin M.W. Randomized controlled trials. Questions, answers, and musings. 2nd ed. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: BMJ Books; 2007: 136 pp.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Historical milestones of the invention and use of placebo;FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology;2023-01-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3