Affiliation:
1. Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control
2. Sechenov University; Institute for Preventive and Social Medicine
3. Ural Scientific Research Institute of Maternity and Infancy Protection
4. IVFarma LLC
5. National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Honorary Academician N.F. Gamaleya
Abstract
Objective: to perform a clinical and economic analysis of using drugs containing follitropin alfa as an active substance and to assess the impact of the studied drugs on the budget of the state healthcare system of the Russian Federation considering cost data for 2022 in the population of women with infertility and poor ovarian response who are undergoing treatment with the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART).Material and methods. Clinical and economic evaluation of follitropin alfa use in patients with infertility and poor ovarian response was performed by a cost minimization method, using data from the Uniform Information System for Procurement for the period from July to December 2022 inclusive. The budget impact analysis model compared the costs required for ovarian stimulation of patients with poor ovarian response receiving only a fixed dose combination (FDC) of follitropin alfa + lutropin alfa with the expected practice of switching 25% of these patients to follitropin alfa with a modeling time horizon of 1 year.Results. A cost analysis of an ovarian stimulation course using biosimilar follitropin alfa showed cost savings of 17% compared with the cost of therapy using the original follitropin alfa. Also, cost minimization analysis per cycle of ovarian stimulation demonstrated that the use of the biosimilar follitropin alfa was characterized by cost savings of 24,420 rubles (32.37%) compared to FCD of follitropin alfa + lutropin alfa. Compared to the 2021 data, in the current study based on 2022 data and including only biosimilar follitropin alfa, there was a 103% increase in savings. Budget impact analysis determined that switching 25% of the population from FCD of follitropin alfa + lutropin alfa to follitropin alfa would reduce direct medical costs by 17.3 million rubles (8.1%) per year. Savings in direct medical costs in the current study compared to 2021 increased by 117%.Conclusion. The clinical and economic analysis, as well as the budget impact analysis of using biosimilar follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in a population of women with infertility and poor ovarian response, confirm the economic expediency revealed in 2021. Moreover, according to 2022 data, the use of biosimilar follitropin alfa results in additional budgetary savings.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmacology
Reference32 articles.
1. Malyshkina A.I., Dolgushina N.V., Pesikin O.N., Kuligina M.V. Methodological approaches to evaluating the efficiency of using assisted reproductive technologies at the regional level. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya / Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; 11: 148–54 (in Russ.).https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.11.148-154.
2. Novoselova E.N. Social aspects of reproductive health among the female population in Russia. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2018; 24 (2): 121–38 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-2-121-138.
3. Philippov O.S., Radionchenko A.A., Bolotova V.P., et al. Estimation of the prevalence and causes of infertility in western Siberia. Bull World Health Organ. 1998; 76 (2): 183–7.
4. Clinical guidelines. Female infertility (CG 641). Developers: Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, LLC “Russian Association of Human Reproduction” (RAHR). 2023. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/641_1 (in Russ.) (accessed 24.01.2023).
5. Perminova S.G., Nazarenko Т.А., Korneeva I.Е., et al. Comparative study of the equivalence of the biosimilar follitropin alpha preparation (solution for subcutaneous injection) and the original follitropin alpha preparation (lyophilisate for preparation of solution for subcutaneous administration) in women with different responses to ovarian stimulation in an in vitro fertilization program: results of a phase IV clinical trial. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya / Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; 10: 138–49 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.10.138-149.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献