Examining Academicians’ and Teachers’ Opinions on Designing Science Activities in Informal Settings

Author:

Köseoğlu PelinORCID,Türkmen HakanORCID

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine what teachers and academicians think about the process of designing and implementing science activities in informal settings and make suggestions as to how to teach more effectively in them. This study is a cross-sectional survey study and divided the teachers constituting the sample group into subgroups (sections), namely, those who had received training in teaching science in informal settings and those who had not. The current opinions of the academicians were also included in the research. A total of 338 people – 304 science teachers and 34 academicians – participated in this study. A questionnaire was used to collect the data for the research. When the research findings were examined, it was seen that neither teachers nor academicians have the desired levels of knowledge about planning and implementing science-teaching activities in informal settings. The fact that teachers do not have sufficient information on this subject can be interpreted as a reflection of the inadequacy of academicians and government instructors who train and support teachers.

Publisher

European Institute of Knowledge and Innovation

Reference38 articles.

1. Bozdoğan, A. E. (2008). Planning and evaluation of field trips to informal learning environments: case of the ‘Energy Park’. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4(2), 282-290.

2. Bozdoğan, A. E. (2016). Okul dışı çevrelerde gezi-gözlem çalışmaları. Ö. Keleş (Ed.), in Uygulamalı etkinliklerle fen eğitiminde yeni yaklaşımlar (p.1-44). Ankara: PegemA.

3. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem.

4. Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S. (2019). Örnekleme yöntemleri. H. Özmen ve O. Karamustafaoğlu (Ed.), in Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri (p.56-78). Ankara: PegemA.

5. Carrier S. J., Tugurian, L. P. & Thomson M. M. (2013). Elementary science indoors and out: teachers, time, and testing. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2059-2083

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3