The Phenomenon of Racism and the Concept of Race: A Transdisciplinary Research

Author:

Novikova Olga V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Belarusian State University

Abstract

In recent decades, with development of scientific and philosophical knowledge, the transdisciplinary approach has become relevant, as it aims at comprehensive study of complex natural and social phenomena. Racism belongs among such phenomena, and it it is usually studied in sociology and historical science. The article presents a transdisciplinary study of racism, involving a complex appeal to philosophy, history, sociology, and other disciplines. Special attention is paid to the philosophical conceptualization of racism and the relationship of racism with the category of race. The article follows the evolution of the concept of race in philosophy, science and social and political practices from its origins to the 20th and 21st centuries, when this concept is declared to be artificially constructed and is gradually ousted from philosophical and scientific discourse. Bioanthropologists criticize the concept of race as inaccurate, while intellectuals see racial classifications as a sign of racism. The difficulty of the conceptualization is associated not only with the variability of the concept of race but also with the change in its historical types, from traditional to contemporary ones. Traditional (classical, biological) racism is based on the use of the category of race and the idea of insurmountable biological differences between representatives of different races. The aritcle concludes that present-day racism exists in two forms: class (institutional) racism and cultural (differential or “subtle”) racism. Class racism is associated with social and political practices of implicit segregation in employment and, accordingly, with unequal distribution of income. Cultural racism shifts the focus from biology to culture and emphasizes the insurmountability of cultural differences.

Publisher

Humanist Publishing House

Reference25 articles.

1. American Association of Biological Anthropologists (AABA) (2019) Statement on Race & Racism. Retrieved from https://physanth.org/about/position-statements/aapa-statement-race-and-racism-2019/.

2. Balibar E. (1991) Racism and Nationalism. In: Balibar E. & Wallersteinn I. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities (pp. 37–68). London: Verso.

3. Blaisdell B. (2018) The new one-drop rule: challenging the persistence of white supremacy with in-service teachers. Teaching Education. Vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 330–342.

4. Bonilla-Silva E. (2019) “Racists,” “Class Anxieties,” Hegemonic Racism, and Democracy in Trump’s America. Social Currents. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 14–31.

5. Commission nationale consultative des droits de l’homme (CNCDH) (2020) Rapport sur la lutte contre le racisme, l’antisemitisme et la xenofobie. Annee 2020. Retrieved from https://www.cncdh.fr/sites/default/files/rapport_racisme2020_basse_def.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3