Anthropological Crisis in the Social Realities of the 21st Century

Author:

Korol Andrey D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Belarusian State University

Abstract

The article examines the modern anthropological crisis in the context of various social phenomena. The author identifies key features of this crisis and reveals its causes. The article, addressing such philosophical concepts as time, space, happiness, motivation, analyzes the theories on the essence of this crisis. The author discusses the issues of self-alienation in an accelerating and polarizing world, of dialectical antagonism, of contradiction between the Self and the Other. The article critically analyzes the modern forms of consumerism, the consumer society, and the liberal worldview. Written in the essay form, the article poses the questions to the reader: How and why does man lose and acquire his meanings? What role do words and silence play in that? Who wins in the existential race “man versus society”? The author argues that a person does not see his absolute, since his expanding outer space narrows the inner space. The stratification of internal and external space (which is advisable to understand as a consequence of the loss of contact with reality) is the cause of lies, violence, and aggression. Liberal form of worldview is interpreted in a dialectical form: as the opposition of slavery, preserving its original vices. The article demonstrates how progress can lead to chaos in social life. Distinguishing three types of personality (directive, democratic, and liberal-permissive), it is concluded that the latter type of personality forms a border between the external and internal world. This kind of gap is the source of growing social and psycho-logical chaos. The concludes with a discussion of the possibility of happiness in modern social conditions.

Publisher

Humanist Publishing House

Reference14 articles.

1. Avtonomova N.S. (2008) Cognition and Translation: Experiments in the Philosophy of Language. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Russian).

2. Deleuze G. & Guattari F. (1996) Rhizome. In: Usmanova A. (Ed.) The Philosophy of the Postmodernity (pp. 6–31). Minsk: Krasiko-print (Russian translation).

3. Emelin V.A. & Tkhostov A.S. (2013) The Babylonian Network: Erosion of Truth and Diffusion of Identity in the Internet Space. Voprosy filosofii. No. 1, pp. 74–81 (in Russian).

4. Kirvel C.S. (2020) Man in the Face of the Future: Risks and Prospects. Grodno: Grodno State University Press (in Russian).

5. Korol A.D. (2019) Silence in Dialogue as a Problem of Philosophy of Education. Voprosy filosofii. No. 4, pp. 6–11 (in Russian).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3