Digitized Future of Medicine: Challenges for Bioethics

Author:

Grebenshchikova Elena G.1ORCID,Tishchenko Pavel D.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

2. Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The article discusses the challenges, benefits, and risks that, from a bioethical perspective, arise because of the the development of eHealth projects. The conceptual framework of the research is based on H. Jonas’ principles of the ethics of responsibility and B.G. Yudin’s anthropological ideas on human beings as agents who constantly change their own boundaries in the “zone of phase transitions.” The article focuses on the events taking place in the zone of phase transitions between humans and machines in eHealth. It is shown that for innovative practices related to digitalization and datafication in medicine, it is needed to rethink central bioethical concepts of personal autonomy and informed consent. In particular, the concept of broad or open informed consent is discussed, which allows the idea of moral responsibility in the field of biomedical technologies to be extended to events of uncertain future. The authors draw attention to the problems associated with the emergence of new autonomous subjects/agents (machines with artificial intelligence) in relationship between doctors and patients. The humanization of machines occurring in eHealth is accompanied by a counter trend – the formation of conceptions and practices of the quantified self. There emerges the practices of self-care and bio-power (M. Foucault) caused by the datafication and digitization of personality. The authors conclude that bioethics should proactively develop norms for the evolving interaction between doctor and patients.

Publisher

Humanist Publishing House

Reference27 articles.

1. Abrugar V. (2014) Quantified self: how self-tracking technology can improve your life. Retrieved from https://blog.goalmap.com/en/quantifiedself-how-self-tracking-technology-can-improve-your-life/

2. Anderson M. & Anderson S.L. (Eds.) (2011) Machine Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

3. Barkham P. (2000, June 8) Is the net healthy for doctors? The Guardian. P. 2.

4. Christen M. et al. (2016) On the compatibility of big data driven research and informed consent: the example of the human brain project. In: The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data (pp. 199–218). Cham: Springer,.

5. Cohen G., Vayena E., & Gasser U. (2018) Introduction. In: Big Data, Health Law, and Bioethics (pp. 1–13). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3