The Problem of the Influence of Possible Worlds on the Nature of Their Perception under the Conditions of Various Fundamental Physical Principles

Author:

Karpenko Ivan A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Research University Higher School of Economy

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of interpreting of the several consequences that derive from multi-world concepts of modern physics. The inflation scenario and the associated string landscape model are the objects of analysis. The reviewed multi-world concepts are exposed to presume the existence of a plenitude (possibly infinite) of various fundamental principles (laws of nature) that govern the physics of one or another possible reality. The research is based on the hermeneutical method, comparative method, dialectical method, formal translation method, and scientific modeling method. The author represents specifics of physical theories (the criteria and requirements for them) that claim to describe all possible worlds in the conclusions. In this regard, the issues of the status of “possible” and “impossible” worlds and practicable ways to determine them are discussed. The main result of the study is the justification (based on the assumption of many fundamentally different worlds scenario possibility) that each type of world must correspond to a certain structure of consciousness defined by its basic physical principles (and probably other mathematics). This possibly means that a unified “theory of everything” that includes all possible mathematical and physical fundamental structures cannot exist since every one of them determines a specific type of consciousness (where it is possible).

Publisher

Humanist Publishing House

Reference30 articles.

1. Arshinov V.I. (2013) Complexity Observer in the Context of the PostNon-Classical Rationality Paradigm. In: Philosophy of Science in the World of Complexity (pp. 42–61). Moscow: Institute of philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).

2. Ashok S. & Douglas М. (2004) Counting Flux Cacua. Journal of High Energy Physics. Vol. 1, p. 60.

3. Barrow J. (2008) New Theories of Everything. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Bermúdez J.L. (2014) Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

5. Carroll S. &Chen J. (2004) Spontaneous Inflation and the Origin of the Arrow of Time. Retrieved April 4, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/hepth/0410270.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3