Affiliation:
1. National Research University Higher School of Economics; Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Science
Abstract
The article considers the problem of universal basic income (regular monetary payment to each person regardless of his financial or employment status). The author believes that this topic can become one of the most relevant for social-philosophical research. The author notes that although the problem has been of concern to philosophers and scientists for a long time, it has become especially relevant only recently – over the past ten years. The following reasons are given as an explanation: (a) recent experiments on the introduction of a universal basic income in Western countries, (b) the trend toward automation and technologization, (c) the transformation of the economy, which is becoming more and more precarious. The author notes that the topic of universal basic income has become relevant even in Russian science, however, not in social philosophy, as in the West, but mainly in economics. The author argues that, since the discussion about basic income in the economic dimension has already taken place, it should be expanded to the field of social philosophy. To do this, the author raises a number of questions that will shed light on the social-philosophical nature of the problem of universal basic income – freedom, justice, welfare state, etc. Special attention is paid to the curious ideological transformations that became possible by the emergence of topic of basic income. First of all, basic income contributes to the formation of new ideologies, such as post-capitalism. Secondly, basic income itself can be considered as a new ideology, which is a synthesis of other ideological trends – libertarianism, feminism, Marxism, etc. Thirdly, post-capitalism, which emphasizes basic income, opens up much more significant problems than replacing labor and turning all people into a precariat. The author hopes that this paper will serve as the beginning of the discussion of the issue of basic income in the context of social-philosophical knowledge.
Publisher
Humanist Publishing House
Reference22 articles.
1. Crouch C. (2019) Will the Gig Economy Prevail? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
2. Davydov D. (2016) The Concept of Basic Income: Towards Communism or Rental Society? Neprikosnovennyi zapas. No. 2, pp. 46–57 (in Russian).
3. Dean J. (2019) Communism or Neo-Feodalism? Logos. Vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 85–116 (Russian translation).
4. Fishman L.G., Martyanov V.S., & Davydov D.A. (2019) Rental Society: In the Shadow of Capital, Labor and Democracy. Moscow: HSE Publishing House (in Russian).
5. Gorz A. (1999) Reclaiming Work: Beyond the Wage–Based Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Capitalism is Ending, but;World Economy and International Relations;2022