Effect of microbial consortia on maize yield in Chiapas, Mexico
-
Published:2023-07-26
Issue:3
Volume:40
Page:e234026
-
ISSN:2477-9407
-
Container-title:Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad del Zulia
-
language:es
-
Short-container-title:RevFacAgron(LUZ)
Author:
Rosabal Lissy1ORCID, Guevara Hernández Francisco1ORCID, Ruiz Víctor2ORCID, La O Manuel1ORCID, Raj Deb1ORCID, Reyes Mariela1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas. Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas. Carretera Ocozocoautla. Villaflores Km. 84.5 C.P. 30470. Villaflores, Chiapas, México. 2. Tecnológico Nacional de México / Instituto Tecnológico de Tuxtla Gutiérrez. Carretera Panamericana km. 1080. C.P. 29050. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, México.
Abstract
The use of microbial consortia as biofertilizers allows improving crop productivity and the quality of agricultural soils, by incorporating microorganisms that facilitate the availability of nutrients for plants and change the soil physicochemical conditions. In order to evaluate the effect of microbial consortia on maize yield, inoculums from different environments were used in the maize crop of Villa Corzo and Villaflores municipalities, Chiapas. Six treatments with different consortia were defined: three from agricultural plots and three from mountains “La Frailescana”, “Cerro Nambiyugua” and Biosphere Reserve “La Sepultura”-, and one control, under a randomized block experimental design with four replications. The application of the microbial consortia was made directly to the soil at 20, 40 and 60 days after sowing of the crop. The effect of the consortia on maize yield was determined using a design with nested effects in which the effects of the origin of the microbial consortia were controlled, and the nested treatments in the environments. The association between the physicochemical components of the consortia and the culture yield was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation (p ≤ 0.05). Only the mountain consortiums from “La Sepultura” were the ones that showed maize yield increase. However, both the mountain and plot consortiums have the potential to be used as biofertilizers in maize cultivation, when combined with another source of organic fertilization, such as poultry manure.
Publisher
Universidad del Zulia
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Alarcón-Camacho, J., Recharte-Pineda, D.C., Yanqui-Díaz, F., Moreno-LLacza, M., Montes-Yarasca, I.M., & Buendía-Molina, M.A. (2019). Elaboración de un biofertilizante a partir de microorganismos eficientes autóctonos en Perú. Anales Científicos, 80(2), 515–522.https://doi.org/10.21704/ac.v80i2.1484 2. Álvarez-Sánchez, E., Améndola-Massiotti, R., Cristóbal-Acevedo, D., & Soto-Barajas, M.C. (2014). Pérdidas de nitrógeno por lixiviación en una pradera mixta pastoreada en clima templado. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 37(3), 271-278.https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2014.3.271 3. Ayvar, S., Díaz, J.F., Vargas, M., Mena, A., Tejeda, M.A., & Cuevas, Z. (2020). Rentabilidad de sistemas de producción de grano y forraje de híbridos de maíz, con fertilización biológica y química en trópico seco. Terra Latinoamericana, 38(1), 9-16.https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v38i1.507 4. Cabos-Sánchez, J., Bardales-Vásquez, C.B., León-Torres, C.A., & Gil-Ramírez, L.A. (2019). Evaluación de las concentraciones de Nitrógeno, Fósforo y Potasio del biol y biosol obtenidos a partir de estiércol de ganado vacuno en un biodigestor de geomembrana de policloruro de vinilo. Arnaldoa, 26(3), 1165-1176.http://dx.doi.org/10.22497/arnaldoa.263.26321 5. Castro, L., & González, J. (2021). Factores relacionados con la activación líquida de microorganismos de montaña (mm). Agronomía Costarricense, 45(1), 81-92.http://www.mag.go.cr/rev_agr/v45n01_081.pdf
|
|