Regenerative livestock or sustainable livestock?

Author:

Urdaneta Fatima1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Profesora Emérita. Doctora de la Universidad de Córdoba (España), M.Sc. Producción Animal. Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad del Zulia.

Abstract

Sustainability has been recognized as a fundamental principle of development so that humanity can survive on this planet. However, there are still difficulties in translating its philosophical principles into the ability to make concrete decisions for its consolidation. Three factors that determine growth on planet earth, directly related to agricultural systems, have been identified: agricultural production, management of natural resources, and pollution. Therefore, sustainable agriculture must consider them both for the management of plant and animal populations, since both modify the environment to adapt it to their requirements, thus regenerative practices arise to recover the ability of ecosystems to restore themselves. In that sense, it is intended in this review to elucidate how the concepts and principles exposed are translated into a regenerative or a sustainable livestock. To achieve sustainability, it is necessary and essential, an integral management of processes with a holistic vision of the system by farmers and technicians, leading human talents willing to learn different and new technologies, and motivated trained personnel in sustainable techniques that incorporate agroecological and regenerative practices, all on the basis of financial planning. Regenerative livestock per se as an emerging paradigm is very promising, but still requires local research. It is concluded that there is no single model of sustainable livestock, there are no recipes or technological packages, it is governed by the principles that aim at the balance of its dimensions (social, economic, environmental and institutional political governance).

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science

Reference43 articles.

1. Argyropoulos, N. (2014). An Economic Evaluation of Agricultural Management Systems in the Patagonian Grasslands: An Observation of Wool and the Link Between Profitability and [Duke]. http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/8515

2. Bejarano, J. (1997). Un marco institucional para la gestión del medio ambiente y para la sostenibilidad agrícola en agricultura, medio ambiente y pobreza rural en América latina. Ensayos de Economia, 7(13), 142–195. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ede/article/view/23830

3. Borrelli, P. (2016). El Antropoceno y la ganadería regenerativa: desafíos de una nueva era. In Ovis 21 (pp. 1–22). https://ovis21.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Ovis21_El-antropoceno-y-la-ganaderi%CC%81a-regenerativa_opt.pdf

4. Cárdenas, M. (2013). Efecto de la composición botánica sobre la dinámica de degradación ruminal de la ms y pc en praderas permanentes de la Region de Los Ríos. [Universidad Austral de Chile]. http://cybertesis.uach.cl/tesis/uach/2013/fac266e/doc/fac266e.pdf

5. Chamane, S., Kirkman, K., Morris, C., & O’Connor, T. (2017). What are the long-term effects of high-density, short-duration stocking on the soils and vegetation of mesic grassland in South Africa? African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 34(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2017.1364295

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3