Affiliation:
1. Universidad Nacional de Cañete, Escuela Profesional de Agronomía. Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno (UNA-PUNO). Departamento Académico de Ingeniería Agronómica.
2. Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno (UNA-PUNO). Departamento Académico de Ingeniería Agronómica.
3. Bachiller en Ciencias Agrarias, Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Agronómica. UNA -Puno.
4. Departamento Académico de Agroindustrias, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno.
Abstract
The Andean crop germplasm bank, of the Camacani Experimental Center of the Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, has around 400 accessions of cañahua (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen), and 27 of them have been agronomically characterized. Given the importance of this crop for the inhabitants of highlands of the Peruvian Andes, the objective of this research was to assess the population fluctuation of insect pests and the severity of diseases in the mentioned accessions, along with three commercial varieties. The evaluations were carried out in three phases of the crop development, including the grain yield. It was found that the accessions and varieties of cañahua were tolerant to the attack of most pests and diseases. The most important pest was Eurysacca quinoae Povolny, especially in the accession 03-21-26 and the Ramis variety, in which up to 5.5 and 4.5 larvae were found per plant, respectively; however, the pest did not exceed the economic threshold of 6 larvae per plant during the phenological phases. In regards to diseases, it was confirmed that Peronospora sp. (mildew) is the main pathology that occurred during the agricultural season. Accessions 03-21-03 and 03-21-24 were not affected by the disease, while accessions 03-21-267, 03-21-218, 03-21-124, 03-21-26 and 03-21-64 were the most affected, showing the highest severity and area under the disease progress curve. When evaluating one season, the accessions and varieties of cañihua showed resistance to insect-pests and diseases, without appreciably decrease of their grain yields.
Reference25 articles.
1. Literature Cited
2. Apaza, V. (2010). Manejo y mejoramiento de kañiwa. Bioversity Internacional. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente, CIRNMA. Manual 2. Puno-Perú. https://n9.cl/eisro
3. Aguilar, R., More-Yarleque, M. M., Rafael-Rutte, R. y Maldonado, E. (2020). Inductores de defensa en el control del mildiu (Peronospora variabilis Gaum.) en el cultivo de quinua: Detección, epidemiología, síntomas, características y control. Scientia Agropecuaria, 11(4), 555-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.04.11
4. Benique, O. E. (2019). Impacto del cambio climático en el rendimiento de la producción de cañihua (Chenopodium pallidicaule A.) en la Región Puno. Rev. Investigaciones Altoandinas, 21(2), Abril-Junio. https://doi.org/10.18271/ria. 2019.454
5. Bravo, R. (2010). Manejo agroecológico de plagas andinas. Plagas en quinua y cañihua. Editorial Altiplano. Puno-Perú. pp. 53-61.