Abstract
Cultural relativism has its roots in an era long before the emergence of anthropology. Anthropologists, and Franz Boas in particular, took up this concept in order to establish the paradigm of a holistic description of cultures. This concept refrains from any kind of judgements about cultures or comparisons between them. According to cultural relativism there is no objective parameter to adequately describe the value of a culture. Only the subjective perspective of a culture’s members can inform about its particularities. The emphasis on differences and the idea that each part of a culture stands for a coherent whole are other closely related features of descriptions in the framework of cultural relativism.
Boas’s innovative method and therewith the cultural relativist perspective has been so successful that today it can be considered one of the principles of the appreciation of multicultural societies. At the same time, however, it became clear that the renunciation of any critical assessment can also be a handicap for ethnographic description. The rejection of universal norms, such as human rights, and the rejection of criteria applied to a culture from the outside make ethnologists blind to cultural conflicts and power asymmetries. Cultural relativism is thus both an extremely successful concept and a problem for the future shape of anthropology.
Publisher
Johanna Mestorf Academy of Kiel University
Reference78 articles.
1. Abu-Lughod, Janet L. (1991): Writing Against Culture. In: Fox, R.G. (ed.): Recapturing Anthropology. Santa Fe: School of American Research, S. 137-162.
2. Adams, Tony E., Stacy H. Jones, & Carolyn Ellis (2015): Autoethnography. Oxford: Oxford University.
3. Amir-Moazami, Schirin (ed.) (2018): Der inspizierte Muslim. Zur Politisierung der Islamforschung in Europa. Bielefeld: transcript.
4. Antweiler, Christoph (2019): Fremdes und Eigenes. Zur Ethnologie der Beziehungen zwischen Kollektiven. In: Jahrbuch Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie, 6:3-43.
5. Bendle, Mervyn F. (1998): Beyond Eclecticism: The Case for a Moderate Form of Cultural Relativism. In: The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 8(1):21-26.