Author:
Pollock Susan,Bernbeck Reinhard
Abstract
Franz Boas has often been lauded for his anti-racist stance. A closer look at his scholarship suggests that he was, at best, inconsistent in this regard, especially in terms of his engagements with Afro-Americans versus Native Americans. We examine his collecting practices, in particular his acquisition of human remains, during his early research trips, arguing that these reveal quite problematic attitudes towards Native Americans. We frame our arguments by drawing on Axel Honneth’s recognition theory and his distinctions between recognition, reification and objectification. We contend that Boas’s work was, despite his many important contributions, also pervaded by epistemic and structural violence.
Publisher
Johanna Mestorf Academy of Kiel University
Reference30 articles.
1. American Anthropologist 2023: American Anthropologist, Commentary section. American Anthropologist 1, 125, 2023, 168–185.
2. Appiah 2020: K. A. Appiah, The defender of differences: On Franz Boas and his critics, 2020. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/05/28/franz-boas-anthropologist-defender-differences/ (accessed: 24/12/2023).
3. Baker 1998: L. D. Baker, From savage to Negro: Anthropology and the construction of race, 1896-1954 (Berkeley 1998).
4. Bernbeck 2020: R. Bernbeck, Violence in archaeology and the violence of archaeology. In: C.N. Matthews/B.D. Phillippi (eds.), Archaeologies of violence and privilege (Albuquerque 2020) 15–38.
5. Berner et al. 2011: M. Berner/A. Hoffmann/B. Lange, Sensible Sammlungen. Aus dem anthropologischen Depot (Hamburg 2011).