Affiliation:
1. Academic Director, Associate Professor, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
2. Senior Assessment Specialist and Teacher Trainer (UTQ/ SUTQ) Teacher Development, Academic Services, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
Abstract
Character building (CB) is a crucial aspect for basic psychologists who need to carry out their consultation tasks effectively. At Tilburg University, lecturers have the freedom to interpret the five CB dimensions and implement them in courses, including intellectual independence, critical mindset, social responsibility, scientific responsibility, and entrepreneurship. This study aims to investigate how the five CB dimensions are interpreted and implemented in the three-year Bachelor Psychology program at Tilburg University. As part of the regular quality assurance of assessment, we made a full program assessment plan in 2021-2022 and collected extra data on course practices of CB. At the program level, the five CB dimensions were related to the 13 program learning outcomes by reviewing the self-reflection report. At the course level, a template thematic analysis was used to code the course learning goals, instructional activities, and assessment. Two-thirds of the courses formulated CB-related learning goals, mostly delivered through interactive lecture forms. The instructional activities were categorized into six themes: academic standards, application, evaluative judgment, self-regulation, societal relevance, and taking initiatives. The five CB dimensions were mostly assessed by coursework method, but there was a lack of assessment of CB elements such as reflection. The five CB dimensions were implemented in most educational processes at the course and program level, despite the absence of a standardized implementation plan. We advise to focus on the assessment design for character education, particularly through the use of more authentic and performance-based assessment methods.
Reference18 articles.
1. American Psychological Association. (2011). Principles for quality undergraduate education in psychology. http://www.apa.org/education/undergrad/
2. American Psychological Association. (2016). Guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. American Psychologist, 71, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037562
3. Berkowitz, M., & Bier, M. (2007). What works In character education. Journal of Research in Character Education, 5(1), 29-48.
4. Berkowitz, M. W. (2022). Implementing and assessing evidence-based character education. Journal of Education, 202(2), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211026908
5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.