The importance of response times measures in verbal fluency tasks
-
Published:2024-02-09
Issue:1
Volume:29
Page:71-81
-
ISSN:2732-6640
-
Container-title:Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Psychology
Author:
Orologa EmiliaORCID, Chatzopoulos Georgios, Nikolaidis DimitriosORCID, Kosmidis MaryORCID, Proios Hariklia
Abstract
Verbal fluency is a commonly used task in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. It assesses a person’s ability to generate relevant words, according to a given category within a limited amount of time. Phonemic (PF) and semantic (SF) fluency tasks reflect different aspects of language and executive function abilities. In the present study, we investigated first response latency as an additional measure of phonemic, semantic and excluded letter fluency of 44 healthy adults (aged 18 to 39 years old) divided in 2 groups, according to their education level. We investigated potential correlations between response times and education level. Preliminary results from a small sample show that when comparing phonemic, semantic and excluded letter tasks the shortest response time was observed in semantic fluency tasks whereas the excluded letter tasks have the longest (Z = -5.35, p < 0.0005). Education appeared to have a significant negative effect on the mean response times of the participants (for PF U = 137, p = 0.014; for ELF U = 141.5, p = 0.018; for SF t = 2.05, p = 0.046). These results constitute a potential underexamined way to investigate lexical organization and access in verbal fluency. Also, we noted that education contributes not only to overall performance but to response times as well.
Publisher
National Documentation Centre (EKT)
Reference37 articles.
1. Acevedo, A., Loewenstein, D. A., Barker, W. W., Harwood, D. G., Luis, C., Bravo, M., Hurwitz, D., Aguero, H., Greenfield, L., & Duara, R. (2000). Category fluency test: normative data for English-and Spanish-speaking elderly. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(7), 760-769. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617700677032 2. Ardila, A., Ostrosky-Solis, F., & Mendoza, V. U. (2000). Learning to read is much more than learning to read: A neuropsychologically based reading program. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(7), 789-801. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617700677068 3. Ayers, M. R., Bushnell, J., Gao, S., Unverzagt, F., Gaizo, J. D., Wadley, V. G., Kennedy, R., & Clark, D. G. (2022). Verbal fluency response times predict incident cognitive impairment. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 14(1), e12277. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12277 4. Balogh, R., Imre, N., Gosztolya, G., Pákáski, M., & Kálmán, J. (2022). The Role of Silence in Verbal Fluency Tasks–A New Approach for the Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617721001454 5. Birn, R. M., Kenworthy, L., Case, L., Caravella, R., Jones, T. B., Bandettini, P. A., & Martin, A. (2010). Neural systems supporting lexical search guided by letter and semantic category cues: a self-paced overt response fMRI study of verbal fluency. Neuroimage, 49(1),1099-1107. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.036
|
|