Author:
Katz Rebecca,Singer Burton
Abstract
In intelligence investigations, such as those into reports of chemical- or biological-weapons (CBW) use, evidence may be difficult to assemble and, once assembled, to weigh. We propose a methodology for such investigations and then apply it to a large body of recently declassified evidence to determine the extent to which an attribution can now be made in the Yellow Rain case. Our analysis strongly supports the hypothesis that CBW were used in Southeast Asia and Afghanistan in the late 1970s and early 1980s, although a definitive judgment cannot be made. The proposed methodology, while resource-intensive, allows evidence to be assembled and analyzed in a transparent manner so that assumptions and rationale for decisions can be challenged by external critics. We conclude with a discussion of future research directions, emphasizing the use of evolving information-extraction (IE) technologies, a sub-field of artificial intelligence (AI).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference57 articles.
1. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction (1972); available at http://www.state.gov/t/ac/trt/4718.htm#treaty.
2. Up in Smoke: Political Realities and Chemical Weapons Use Allegations during Mozambique's Civil War
3. “Causation and Disease: the Henle-Koch postulates revisited,”;Evans;Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine,1976
4. Toward a Useful Concept of Causality for Lexical Semantics
5. Heberden Oration, 1965. Reflections on the Controlled Trial
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献