Vaccine prophylaxis and its opponents in the modern world

Author:

Galitskaya Marina G.1ORCID,Fisenko Andrey P.2ORCID,Tatochenko Vladimir K.1ORCID,Makarova Svetlana G.2ORCID,Davydova Irina V.1ORCID,Kurdup Mariya K.1ORCID,Yasakov Dmitriy S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health

2. National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health; Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the essential areas of preventive medicine for protecting the population from diseases and infections. They have helped reduce the incidence of severe childhood diseases and, in some cases, have even eradicated some of the world’s infectious diseases. However, since the first available vaccine against smallpox, antivaccine prophylaxis has always accompanied an antivaccine movement based on various myths. More recently, the development of this movement is connected for many reasons. First of all, it is associated with forgetting the world’s population of the severity of many infectious diseases, the consequences of epidemics, and the availability of any information on the Internet. Leading to myths, parents refuse to vaccinate their children, resulting in reduced vaccination coverage, reduced collective immunity and outbreaks of diseases that have already been considered conquered. The article reviews the literature on the results of anti-vaccination research conducted in the Russian Federation and abroad concerning the causes, main postulates of this movement, trends and directions. Scientific evidence is presented that disproves anti-vaccination myths, and the primary arguments for vaccination are presented. The article describes the anti-vaccination movement’s worldwide trend and the Russian features. The position of WHO is presented about overcoming barriers to the adoption and use of vaccines.

Publisher

National Medical Research Center for Childrens Health

Reference46 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ten great public health achievements – United States, 1900–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999; 48(12): 241–3.

2. Massey E. A sermon against the dangerous and sinful practice of inoculation; 2010. Available at: http://name.umdl.umich.edu/N02782.0001.001

3. WHO. The Thirteenth General Program of Work 2019-2023; 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/about/what-we-do/thirteenth-general-programme-of-work-2019---2023

4. Dempsey A.F., Schaffer S., Singer D., Butchart A., Davis M., Freed G.L. Alternative vaccination schedule preferences among parents of young children. Pediatrics. 2011; 128(5): 848–56. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0400

5. Troiano G., Nardi A. Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public Health. 2021; 194: 245–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3