Abstract
In the theory of ordinary differential equations, there is a strange relationship between uniqueness of solutions and convergence of the successive approxi mations. There are examples of differential equations with unique solutions for which the successive approximations do not converge (8) and of differential equations with non-unique solutions for which the successive approximations do converge (2). However, in spite of the known logical independence of these two properties, almost all conditions which assure uniqueness also imply the convergence of the successive approximations. For example, the hypotheses of Kamke's general uniqueness theorem (5), have been shown by Coddington and Levinson to suffice for the convergence of successive approximations, after the addition of one simple monotonicity condition (4). There is one counterexample to this “principle,” a generalization of Kamke's result, to which another condition in addition to a monotonicity assumption must be added before convergence of the successive approximations can be proved (2).
Publisher
Canadian Mathematical Society
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Bibliography;Functional Differential Equations;2016-04-22
2. Fred Brauer: The Man and His Mathematics;Mathematical Approaches for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases: An Introduction;2002
3. Fred Brauer: The Man and His Mathematics;Mathematical Approaches for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases: Models, Methods, and Theory;2002
4. General uniqueness criteria for ordinary differential equations;Applied Mathematics and Computation;1983-02
5. Continuity moduli criteria for ODE's in a Banach space;Journal of Differential Equations;1982-09