Predictors of long-term ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence after combined endo-epicardial ablation in patients with structural heart disease

Author:

Simonova K. A.1ORCID,Orshanskaya V. S.1ORCID,Lebedeva V. K.1ORCID,Garkina S. V.1ORCID,Lyubimtseva T. A.1ORCID,Vander M. A.1ORCID,Miller Yu. V.1ORCID,Tatarsky R. B.1ORCID,Kamenev A. V.1ORCID,Naymushin M. A.1ORCID,Lebedev D. S.2ORCID,Mikhaylov E. N.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Almazov National Medical Research Centre

2. Almazov National Medical Research Centre; Saint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”

Abstract

Purpose. To identify predictors of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after endo-epicardial ablation in patients with structural heart disease.Methods. A prospective observational study included 39 patients with structural heart disease and indications for catheter ablation of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Endo- and epicardial electroanatomical mapping of the ventricular myocardium and ablation of abnormal electrical activity areas were performed. Clinical, ECG characteristics, and voltage maps of bipolar potentials (limits of scar detection <0.5 mV, normal activity >1.5 mV) and unipolar signals (limits <5.0 and >9.0 mV, respectively) on endo- and epicardial surfaces were evaluated. Intraprocedurally, the procedure was considered effective when no VT was inducible; partially effective - when only clinical VT(s) was/were non-inducible. Scheduled patient visits or remote monitoring were performed at 6, 12 and 24 months, and then annually.Results. The mean age of the patients was 49.5±15.7 years (34 men and 5 women). VT recurrences at 6 months were more often detected in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, in subjects with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (42.9% vs. 7.4%), with a lower VT-QRS amplitude in lead III (0.6 [0.4;1.07] versus 1.28 [0.99; 1.53] mV), and when epicardial “scar” area prevailed over endocardial, P<0.05 for all listed parameters. At 12-months, VT recurrence was more common in patients with partially effective ablation (33.3% vs. 5.0% in patients with effective ablation, P=0.02). The presence of electrical storm at the time of ablation was independently associated with recurrences (HR 4.32; 95% CI: 1.06-17.48; P=0.04).Conclusion. In a heterogeneous group of patients, clinical and electrophysiological factors associated with VT recurrence have been identified at various follow-up periods after endo-epicardial ablation. Electrical storm ablation is an independent predictor of VT recurrence in the long-term, up to 5 years of follow-up.

Publisher

Institute of Cardio Technics - INCART

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Deyell MW, Doucette S, Parkash R, et al. Ventricular tachycardia characteristics and outcomes with catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic therapy: insights from the VANISH trial. Europace. 2022; euab328 https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab328.

2. Anderson RD, Ariyarathna N, Lee G, et al. Catheter ablation versus medical therapy for treatment of ventricular tachycardia associated with structural heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and comparison with observational studies. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(10): 1484-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.026.

3. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). European Heart Journal. 2015;36(41): 2793-2867. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316.

4. Romero J, Patel K, Briceno D, et al. Endo-epicardial ablation vs endocardial ablation for the management of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(8): 2022-2031. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14593.

5. Romero J, Cerrud-Rodriguez RC, Di Biase L, et al. Combined Endocardial-Epicardial Versus Endocardial Catheter Ablation Alone for Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(1): 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.08.010.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3